Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31118270›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Evaluation of the Sofia S. pneumoniae FIA for Detection of Pneumococcal Antigen in Patients with Bloodstream Infection.

Emma Olofsson, Volkan Özenci, Simon Athlin

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fluorescence-based index from the SofiaMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparison of FourMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  3. Presentation and outcome of suspected sepsis in a high-HIV burden, high antiretroviral coverage setting.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma OlofssonFaculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Volkan ÖzenciDepartment of Clinical Microbiology F 72, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Simon AthlinFaculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden simon.athlin@regionorebrolan.se.
Örebro University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The usefulness of pneumococcal urinary antigen tests (UATs) in severe pneumococcal infection relies heavily on the performance in bacteremic patients. Fluorescence technology and automatic reading of test results may improve UAT performance. We evaluated the automatically read Sofia

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, BacterialAutomation, LaboratoryBacteremiaFemaleFluorescenceFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedPneumococcal InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, Bacterialantigen specificitycommunity-acquired infectionspneumococcuspneumoniaStreptococcus pneumoniaeurinary antigen test

Identifiers

PMID31118270
PMCPMC6663912
OpenAlexW2946462788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.