Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31118074›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2019

Biobanking in health care: evolution and future directions.

Luigi Coppola, Alessandra Cianflone, Anna Maria Grimaldi, Mariarosaria Incoronato, Paolo Bevilacqua, Francesco Messina, Simona Baselice, Andrea Soricelli, Peppino Mirabelli, Marco Salvatore

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06380530 (Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities), which is not on this map. Cited by 187 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
187citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06380530 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Advanced Surgical Simulation Processes in the Correction of Skeletal Defects and Deformities

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Ortopedico RizzoliRan2024 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsMusculoskeletal Deformity, Musculoskeletal Abnormalities, Musculoskeletal DisorderArmsDeformity correction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

187 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biobanked Liver Organoids: A Roadmap for Precision Hepatology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Establishing a Cervical Cytology Biorepository: A Protocol for Advancing Translational Cervical Cancer Research through Biobanking.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

127 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luigi CoppolaIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Alessandra CianfloneIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Anna Maria GrimaldiIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Mariarosaria IncoronatoIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Paolo BevilacquaIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Francesco MessinaOspedale Evangelico Betania, Naples, Italy.
Simona BaseliceIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Andrea SoricelliIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.
Peppino MirabelliIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy. pmirabelli@sdn-napoli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2183-7577
Marco SalvatoreIRCCS SDN, Naples Via Emanuele Gianturco, 11, 80143, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present review is to discuss how the promising field of biobanking can support health care research strategies. As the concept has evolved over time, biobanks have grown from simple biological sample repositories to complex and dynamic units belonging to large infrastructure networks, such as the Pan-European Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI). Biobanks were established to support scientific knowledge. Different professional figures with varied expertise collaborate to obtain and collect biological and clinical data from human subjects. At same time biobanks preserve the human and legal rights of each person that offers biomaterial for research.

methodsA literature review was conducted in April 2019 from the online database PubMed, accessed through the Bibliosan platform. Four primary topics related to biobanking will be discussed: (i) evolution, (ii) bioethical issues, (iii) organization, and (iv) imaging.

resultsMost biobanks were founded as local units to support specific research projects, so they evolved in a decentralized manner. The consequence is an urgent needing for procedure harmonization regarding sample collection, processing, and storage. Considering the involvement of biomaterials obtained from human beings, different ethical issues such as the informed consent model, sample ownership, veto rights, and biobank sustainability are debated. In the face of these methodological and ethical challenges, international organizations such as BBMRI play a key role in supporting biobanking activities. Finally, a unique development is the creation of imaging biobanks that support the translation of imaging biomarkers (identified using a radiomic approach) into clinical practice by ensuring standardization of data acquisition and analysis, accredited technical validation, and transparent sharing of biological and clinical data.

conclusionModern biobanks permit large-scale analysis for individuation of specific diseases biomarkers starting from biological or digital material (i.e., bioimages) with well-annotated clinical and biological data. These features are essential for improving personalized medical approaches, where effective biomarker identification is a critical step for disease diagnosis and prognosis.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksDelivery of Health CareBlood Specimen CollectionDatabases as TopicGenomicsHumansPublicationsBiobankBiobankingBioethicsHuman samplesImaging biobankPersonalized medicineRadiogenomicsRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID31118074
PMCPMC6532145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.