Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31118067›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019

Computational models for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular drug reactions.

Salma Jamal, Waseem Ali, Priya Nagpal, Sonam Grover, Abhinav Grover

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Application Progress of Organoids in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Computational healthcare: Present and future perspectives (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Salma JamalJH-Institute of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Waseem AliJH-Institute of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Priya NagpalDepartment of Biotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Sonam GroverJH-Institute of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India. sonamgbt@gmail.com.
Abhinav GroverSchool of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. abhinavgr@gmail.com.
Jamia Hamdard · INDepartment of Biotechnology · INInstitute of Molecular Medicine · INJawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has become very important owing to the huge global health burden and failure of drugs. This indicates a need for prior prediction of probable ADRs in preclinical stages which can improve drug failures and reduce the time and cost of development thus providing efficient and safer therapeutic options for patients. Though several approaches have been put forward for in silico ADR prediction, there is still room for improvement.

methodsIn the present work, we have used machine learning based approach for cardiovascular (CV) ADRs prediction by integrating different features of drugs, biological (drug transporters, targets and enzymes), chemical (substructure fingerprints) and phenotypic (therapeutic indications and other identified ADRs), and their two and three level combinations. To recognize quality and important features, we used minimum redundancy maximum relevance approach while synthetic minority over-sampling technique balancing method was used to introduce a balance in the training sets.

resultsThis is a rigorous and comprehensive study which involved the generation of a total of 504 computational models for 36 CV ADRs using two state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms: random forest and sequential minimization optimization. All the models had an accuracy of around 90% and the biological and chemical features models were more informative as compared to the models generated using chemical features.

conclusionsThe results obtained demonstrated that the predictive models generated in the present study were highly accurate, and the phenotypic information of the drugs played the most important role in drug ADRs prediction. Furthermore, the results also showed that using the proposed method, different drugs properties can be combined to build computational predictive models which can effectively predict potential ADRs during early stages of drug development.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAlgorithmsCardiovascular AgentsDatabases as TopicDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansMachine LearningPhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsCardiovascular AgentsAdverse drug reactionsFeature selectionMachine learningRandom forestSequential minimization optimization

Identifiers

PMID31118067
PMCPMC6530172
OpenAlexW2947083459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.