ArticleJournal of translational medicine2019
Computational models for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular drug reactions.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Identify Patterns and Predictors of Adverse Drug Reactions in Cardiovascular Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Drug Safety Across the Lifecycle and Decision Type: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- MultiFG: integrating molecular fingerprints and graph embeddings via attention mechanisms for robust drug side effect prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating chemical effects on human neural cells through calcium imaging and deep learning.iScience · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Drug-Related Side Effects: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advancing Adverse Drug Reaction Prediction with Deep Chemical Language Model for Drug Safety Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Insights into Drug Cardiotoxicity from Biological and Chemical Data: The First Public Classifiers for FDA Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity Rank.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Insights into Drug Cardiotoxicity from Biological and Chemical Data: The First Public Classifiers for FDA DICTrank.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- An extensive survey on the use of supervised machine learning techniques in the past two decades for prediction of drug side effects.Artificial intelligence review · 2023Article
- Integrative analysis of chemical properties and functions of drugs for adverse drug reaction prediction based on multi-label deep neural network.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular informatics: building a bridge to data harmony.Cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- Application Progress of Organoids in Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Computational healthcare: Present and future perspectives (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Combining a Pharmacological Network Model with a Bayesian Signal Detection Algorithm to Improve the Detection of Adverse Drug Events.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence: Practical Primer for Clinical Research in Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has become very important owing to the huge global health burden and failure of drugs. This indicates a need for prior prediction of probable ADRs in preclinical stages which can improve drug failures and reduce the time and cost of development thus providing efficient and safer therapeutic options for patients. Though several approaches have been put forward for in silico ADR prediction, there is still room for improvement.
methodsIn the present work, we have used machine learning based approach for cardiovascular (CV) ADRs prediction by integrating different features of drugs, biological (drug transporters, targets and enzymes), chemical (substructure fingerprints) and phenotypic (therapeutic indications and other identified ADRs), and their two and three level combinations. To recognize quality and important features, we used minimum redundancy maximum relevance approach while synthetic minority over-sampling technique balancing method was used to introduce a balance in the training sets.
resultsThis is a rigorous and comprehensive study which involved the generation of a total of 504 computational models for 36 CV ADRs using two state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms: random forest and sequential minimization optimization. All the models had an accuracy of around 90% and the biological and chemical features models were more informative as compared to the models generated using chemical features.
conclusionsThe results obtained demonstrated that the predictive models generated in the present study were highly accurate, and the phenotypic information of the drugs played the most important role in drug ADRs prediction. Furthermore, the results also showed that using the proposed method, different drugs properties can be combined to build computational predictive models which can effectively predict potential ADRs during early stages of drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.