Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31118056›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019

Fetal XCMR: a numerical phantom for fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Christopher W Roy, Davide Marini, William Paul Segars, Mike Seed, Christopher K Macgowan

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Motion compensated whole-heart coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using focused navigation (fNAV).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  6. Virtual clinical trials in medical imaging: a review.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher W RoyDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-8840
Davide MariniDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
William Paul SegarsDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mike SeedDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher K MacgowanDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. christopher.macgowan@sickkids.ca.
University of Toronto · CADuke Medical Center · USHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
Precision Cardiac CT: Development of a Computational Platform for Optimizing ImagingR01HL131753 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
CIHR PJT 148505NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131753NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValidating new techniques for fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is challenging due to random fetal movement that precludes repeat measurements. Consequently, fetal CMR development has been largely performed using physical phantoms or postnatal volunteers. In this work, we present an open-source simulation designed to aid in the development and validation of new approaches for fetal CMR. Our approach, fetal extended Cardiac-Torso cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (Fetal XCMR), builds on established methods for simulating CMR acquisitions but is tailored toward the dynamic physiology of the fetal heart and body. We present comparisons between the Fetal XCMR phantom and data acquired in utero, resulting in image quality, anatomy, tissue signals and contrast.

methodsExisting extended Cardiac-Torso models are modified to create maternal and fetal anatomy, combined according to simulated motion, mapped to CMR contrast, and converted to CMR data. To provide a comparison between the proposed simulation and experimental fetal CMR images acquired in utero, images from a typical scan of a pregnant woman are included and simulated acquisitions were generated using matching CMR parameters, motion and noise levels. Three reconstruction (static, real-time, and CINE), and two motion estimation methods (translational motion, fetal heart rate) from data acquired in transverse, sagittal, coronal, and short-axis planes of the fetal heart were performed to compare to in utero acquisitions and demonstrate feasibility of the proposed simulation framework.

resultsOverall, CMR contrast, morphologies, and relative proportions of the maternal and fetal anatomy are well represented by the Fetal XCMR images when comparing the simulation to static images acquired in utero. Additionally, visualization of maternal respiratory and fetal cardiac motion is comparable between Fetal XCMR and in utero real-time images. Finally, high quality CINE image reconstructions provide excellent delineation of fetal cardiac anatomy and temporal dynamics for both data types.

conclusionThe fetal CMR phantom provides a new method for evaluating fetal CMR acquisition and reconstruction methods by simulating the underlying anatomy and physiology. As the field of fetal CMR continues to grow, new methods will become available and require careful validation. The fetal CMR phantom is therefore a powerful and convenient tool in the continued development of fetal cardiac imaging.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, CardiovascularPhantoms, ImagingAnatomic LandmarksFemaleFetal HeartHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisReproducibility of ResultsFetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imagingGolden angle radialMotion correctionNumerical simulationPhysiological motionPost-processing

Identifiers

PMID31118056
PMCPMC6532268
OpenAlexW2947783957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.