Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31118039›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2019

Identification of Escherichia coli from broiler chickens in Jordan, their antimicrobial resistance, gene characterization and the associated risk factors.

Rekaz A Ibrahim, Tillie L Cryer, Shawkat Q Lafi, Ehab-Abu Basha, Liam Good, Yaser H Tarazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Avian PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Molecular Characterization and Antibiotic Resistance of Avian PathogenicAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Occurrence and characterization ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rekaz A IbrahimDepartment of Basic Medical Veterinary Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. rakaelibrahim@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3634-2323
Tillie L CryerPathobiology and Population Sciences Department, the Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Shawkat Q LafiDepartment of Pathology and Public Health, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Ehab-Abu BashaDepartment of Basic Medical Veterinary Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Liam GoodPathobiology and Population Sciences Department, the Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Yaser H TaraziDepartment of Basic Medical Veterinary Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

Jordan University of Science and Technology 267/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is the principle cause of colibacillosis affecting poultry. The main challenge to the poultry industry is antimicrobial resistance and the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria that threaten the safety of the food chain. Risk factors associated with emergence of antimicrobial resistance among avian pathogenic E. coli were correlated with the inappropriate use of antimicrobials along with inadequate hygienic practices, which encourages the selection pressure of antimicrobial resistant APEC. The aim of this study was to isolate, identify, serogroup and genotype APEC from broilers, assess their antibiotic resistance profile, expressed genes and the associated risk factors.

resultsAPEC was isolated from the visceral organs of sick chickens with a prevalence of 53.4%. The most prevalent serotypes were O1, O2, O25 and O78, in percentage of 14.8, 12.6, 4.4 and 23.7%, respectively. Virulence Associated Genes; SitA, iss, iucD, iucC, astA, tsh cvi and irp2 were detected in rate of 97.4, 93.3, 75, 74, 71, 46.5, 39 and 34%, respectively and 186 (69.2%) isolates possess > 5-10 genes. The highest resistance was found against sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim, florfenicol, amoxicillin, doxycycline and spectinomycin in percentage; 95.5, 93.7, 93.3, 92.2 and 92.2%, respectively. Sixty-eight percent of APEC isolates were found to have at least 5 out of 8 antimicrobial resistant genes. The most predominant genes were Int1 97%, tetA 78.4%, bla TEM 72.9%, Sul1 72.4%, Sul2 70.2%. Two risk factors were found to be associated with the presence of multi-drug resistant APEC in broiler chickens, with a P value ≤0.05; the use of ground water as source of drinking water and farms located in proximity to other farms.

conclusionsThis study characterized the VAGs of avian pathogenic E. coli and establish their antimicrobial resistance patterns. The widespread of antimicrobial resistance of APEC isolates and detection of ARGs highlighted the need to monitor the spread of ARGs in poultry farms and the environment in Jordan. Use of ground water and closely located farms were significant risk factors associated with the presence of MDR APEC in broiler chickens in Jordan.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGroundwaterJordanPoultry DiseasesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial ResistanceAPECBroiler chickensColibacillosisJordanRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31118039
PMCPMC6530146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.