ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019
Prevalence of low back pain, seeking medical care, and lost time due to low back pain among manual material handling workers in the United States.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022Pooled it
- Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among professional drivers: A systematic review.Journal of occupational health · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy of intramuscular glucocorticoid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain: a randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- The effectiveness of social media and in-person interventions for low back pain conditions in nursing personnel (SMILE).Nursing open · 2021Trial
- Prevalence of Low Back Pain in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 124 Studies.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Demographic and Biomedical Characteristics of an Observational Cohort With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Descriptive Analysis.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Article
- Risk Factors of Low Back Pain Among Railway Track-Maintainers in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating adaptiveness of an active back exosuit for dynamic lifting and maximum range of motion.Ergonomics · 2024Article
- Effects of Movement Retraining and Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Effort-Reward Imbalance and Low Back Pain Among Industrial Workers: A Cross-sectional Study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Pay-for-performance and low back pain with interaction of overwork: findings from the cross-sectional Korean working conditions survey.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Prevention of Work Absence Due to Back Pain: A Network Meta-Analysis.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Review
- Addressing Occupational Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Preventive and Therapeutic Strategies.Cureus · 2023Review
- Management of Neck or Back Pain in Ambulatory Care: Did Visit Mode or the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Provider Practice or Patient Adherence?Medical care · 2023Article
- Impact of a passive upper-body exoskeleton on muscle activity, heart rate and discomfort during a carrying task.PloS one · 2023Article
- Low Back Pain Prevalence among Distance Learning Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Observational
- Psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain in daycare (nursery) workers in Japan: a prospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies.Current pain and headache reports · 2022Review
- Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem throughout the United States. To achieve a greater understanding of the occupational risk factors, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) funded a low back health effects consortium, which performed several surveillance studies throughout the United States. This study combines data from the consortium research groups resulting in a data set with nearly 2000 workers in various regions of the country. The purpose of this paper is to examine prevalence and personal risk factors of low back health effects among these workers.
methodsThere were three common questions regarding history of low back health effects in the past 12 months including 1) have you had LBP lasting 7 days, 2) have you sought medical care for LBP, and 3) have you taken time off work due to LBP. The questionnaire included demographic questions. There were five data collections institutions or sites including NIOSH, Ohio State University, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Texas A&M University, and University of Utah.
resultsThe 12-month period prevalence of low back pain lasting 7 days, seeking medical care, and lost time due to LBP were 25, 14 and 10%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age or weight between cases and non-cases for any prevalence measure. The height of workers was significantly greater in the cases compared to non-cases for all three prevalence definitions. There were significant differences among the sites on the prevalence of seeking medical care for LBP and lost time due to LBP. The Ohio State University had significantly higher prevalence rates for seeking medical care and lost time due to LBP than University of Wisconsin, University of Utah, or Texas A&M University.
conclusionLBP, the least severe low back health effect studied, had the highest prevalence (25%) and lost time due to LBP, the most severe low back health effect studied, had the lowest prevalence (10%) among nearly 2000 US manual material handling workers. There was a significant site or regional influence in prevalence rates for seeking medical care and lost time due to LBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.