ArticleBMC public health2019
Arab world's growing contribution to global leishmaniasis research (1998-2017): a bibliometric study.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoparasites ofVeterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of scientific research development on drinking water supply in natural disaster-affected areas.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Review
- Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- The state of current research on COVID-19 and antibiotic use: global implications for antimicrobial resistance.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2023Article
- Growth in chikungunya virus-related research in ASEAN and South Asian countries from 1967 to 2022 following disease emergence: a bibliometric and graphical analysis.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- Developments in Leishmaniasis diagnosis: A patent landscape from 2010 to 2022.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of the Ecology of Men's Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Research in MENA (1985-2022): Outputs, Trends, Shortcomings and Hotspots.Arab journal of urology · 2023Review
- Current global research landscape on COVID-19 and cancer: Bibliometric and visualization analysis.World journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Literature in Snake Venom-Related Research Worldwide (1933-2022).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Global research onWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Tetrahydropyrimidine and Dihydropyridine Derivatives Against Leishmania Major.Acta parasitologica · 2022Article
- Article
- The Arab region's contribution to global COVID-19 research: Bibliometric and visualization analysis.Globalization and health · 2021Article
- Mapping the situation of research on coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a preliminary bibliometric analysis during the early stage of the outbreak.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- A bibliometric analysis of human strongyloidiasis research (1968 to 2017).Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2019Article
- Global scientific trends on aflatoxin research during 1998-2017: a bibliometric and visualized study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeishmaniasis is a parasitic disease caused by a protozoan of the Leishmania genus, and is considered a neglected tropical disease. It still remains a main public health concern at global level and in Arab world mainly in low-income countries. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the Arab world's growing contribution to global leishmaniasis research.
methodsThis study describes a bibliometric review of all leishmaniasis research publications published between January 1998 and December 2017 indexed on the Scopus database.
resultsThe total number of publications published at global level was 17,570 papers, which achieves an average annual productivity of 878.50 papers publications. Brazil was responsible for the greatest output with the total number of publications of 3865 followed by the Unites States (n = 2729), India (n = 2119), the United Kingdom (n = 1363), and Spain (n = 1274). By limiting the analysis to the publications that have been published by Arab world, the research productivity was 993 papers, which represents 5.65% of total research output at global level in research regarding leishmaniasis. Tunisia was responsible for the greatest output from Arab world with the total number of publications of 297 followed by Sudan (n = 192), Saudi Arabia (n = 131), Morocco (n = 119) and Egypt (n = 67). Since 1998, the growth of publications on leishmaniasis fluctuates, overall showing a rising trend in both global and Arab world. There is a highly significant correlation between publication productivity related to leishmaniasis at global level and the Arab world (r = 0.936; p-value< 0.001). Leishmaniasis treatment, intracellular mechanism of infection, and lifecycle of leishmania are the major current hot topics for the research in this subject at global level and the Arab world.
conclusionsThe current study presents a novel review of the current Arab leishmaniasis-related research, and how these results are related to worldwide output. In comparison to the global research output, the Arab world produced less leishmaniasis research. The data presented in the current study by this innovative approach may serve relevant researchers to direct the global leishmaniasis research to Arab counties in which leishmaniasis is endemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.