Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31117959›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Transcriptomic responses to diet quality and viral infection in Apis mellifera.

Lindsay Rutter, Jimena Carrillo-Tripp, Bryony C Bonning, Dianne Cook, Amy L Toth, Adam G Dolezal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Intestinal Immune Defense System in Insects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Native habitat mitigates feast-famine conditions faced by honey bees in an agricultural landscape.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsay RutterBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, IA, USA.
Jimena Carrillo-TrippDepartment of Microbiology, Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education of Ensenada, Ensenada, 22860, Baja California, Mexico.
Bryony C BonningDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611, FL, USA.
Dianne CookEconometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, VIC, Australia.
Amy L TothDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, IA, USA.
Adam G DolezalDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61801, IL, USA. adolezal@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-1344

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative 2011-04894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParts of Europe and the United States have witnessed dramatic losses in commercially managed honey bees over the past decade to what is considered an unsustainable extent. The large-scale loss of bees has considerable implications for the agricultural economy because bees are one of the leading pollinators of numerous crops. Bee declines have been associated with several interactive factors. Recent studies suggest nutritional and pathogen stress can interactively contribute to bee physiological declines, but the molecular mechanisms underlying interactive effects remain unknown. In this study, we provide insight into this question by using RNA-sequencing to examine how monofloral diets and Israeli acute paralysis virus inoculation influence gene expression patterns in bees.

resultsWe found a considerable nutritional response, with almost 2000 transcripts changing with diet quality. The majority of these genes were over-represented for nutrient signaling (insulin resistance) and immune response (Notch signaling and JaK-STAT pathways). In our experimental conditions, the transcriptomic response to viral infection was fairly limited. We only found 43 transcripts to be differentially expressed, some with known immune functions (argonaute-2), transcriptional regulation, and muscle contraction. We created contrasts to explore whether protective mechanisms of good diet were due to direct effects on immune function (resistance) or indirect effects on energy availability (tolerance). A similar number of resistance and tolerance candidate differentially expressed genes were found, suggesting both processes may play significant roles in dietary buffering from pathogen infection.

conclusionsThrough transcriptional contrasts and functional enrichment analysis, we contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying feedbacks between nutrition and disease in bees. We also show that comparing results derived from combined analyses across multiple RNA-seq studies may allow researchers to identify transcriptomic patterns in bees that are concurrently less artificial and less noisy. This work underlines the merits of using data visualization techniques and multiple datasets to interpret RNA-sequencing studies.

Indexed as

DietNutritional StatusTranscriptomeAnimalsBeesDicistroviridaeGene Expression RegulationGenetic MarkersInsect ProteinsPollinationVirus DiseasesGenetic MarkersInsect ProteinsHoney beeIsraeli acute paralysis virusMonofloral pollenRNA-sequencingVisualization

Identifiers

PMID31117959
PMCPMC6532243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.