Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31117809›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of rhinology & allergy2019

In-office Placement of Mometasone Furoate Sinus Implants for Recurrent Nasal Polyps: A Pooled Analysis.

J Pablo Stolovitzky, Robert C Kern, Joseph K Han, Keith D Forwith, Randall A Ow, Simon K Wright, Andrew Gould, Keith E Matheny, Boris Karanfilov, Saling Huang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of rhinology & allergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The nature of nasal discharge in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis using patient-reported outcomes.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J Pablo Stolovitzky1 ENT of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robert C Kern2 Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Joseph K Han3 Divisions of Rhinology and Endoscopic Sinus - Skull Base Surgery and Allergy, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
Keith D Forwith4 Advanced ENT and Allergy, Louisville, Kentucky.
Randall A Ow5 Sacramento ENT, Roseville, California.
Simon K Wright6 Iowa ENT Center, Des Moines, Iowa.
Andrew Gould4 Advanced ENT and Allergy, Louisville, Kentucky.
Keith E Matheny7 Collin County Ear Nose and Throat, Frisco, Texas.
Boris Karanfilov8 Ohio Sinus Institute, Dublin, Ohio.
Saling Huang9 Palo Alto, California.
James W Stambaugh10 Intersect ENT, Inc., Menlo Park, California.
Anna K Gawlicka10 Intersect ENT, Inc., Menlo Park, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-4884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresProsthesis ImplantationAbsorbable ImplantsAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsChronic DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMometasone FuroateNasal PolypsNasal SpraysParanasal SinusesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory AgentsMometasone FuroateNasal Spraysbioabsorbablechronic sinusitiscorticosteroidendoscopic sinus surgeryethmoidpolyposissinus surgerystent

Identifiers

PMID31117809
PMCPMC6728749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.