Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31117282›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Technologies for the Selection, Culture and Metabolic Profiling of Unique Rhizosphere Microorganisms for Natural Product Discovery.

Saliya Gurusinghe, Tabin L Brooks, Russell A Barrow, Xiaocheng Zhu, Agasthya Thotagamuwa, Paul G Dennis, Vadakattu V S R Gupta, Thiru Vanniasinkam, Leslie A Weston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saliya GurusingheGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia. sgurusinghe@csu.edu.au.
Tabin L BrooksGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia. tabllewellyn@gmail.com.
Russell A BarrowGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia. rubarrow@csu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-1246
Xiaocheng ZhuGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia. xzhu@csu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4468-1090
Agasthya ThotagamuwaGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia. athotagamuwa@csu.edu.au.
Paul G DennisSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. p.dennis@uq.edu.au.
Vadakattu V S R GuptaCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag No. 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. gupta.vadakattu@csiro.au.
Thiru VanniasinkamGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia. tvanniasinkam@csu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9318-3982
Leslie A WestonGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia. leweston@csu.edu.au.

Funding

Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation Honours Support SchemeGrains Research and Development Corporation UCS 00020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small molecule discovery has benefitted from the development of technologies that have aided in the culture and identification of soil microorganisms and the subsequent analysis of their respective metabolomes. We report herein on the use of both culture dependent and independent approaches for evaluation of soil microbial diversity in the rhizosphere of canola, a crop known to support a diverse microbiome, including plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Initial screening of rhizosphere soils showed that microbial diversity, particularly bacterial, was greatest at crop maturity; therefore organismal recovery was attempted with soil collected at canola harvest. Two standard media (Mueller Hinton and gellan gum) were evaluated following inoculation with soil aqueous suspensions and compared with a novel "rhizochip" prototype buried in a living canola crop rhizosphere for microbial culture in situ. Following successful recovery and identification of 375 rhizosphere microbiota of interest from all culture methods, isolates were identified by Sanger sequencing and/or characterization using morphological and biochemical traits. Three bacterial isolates of interest were randomly selected as case studies for intensive metabolic profiling. After successful culture in liquid media and solvent extraction, individual extracts were subjected to evaluation by UHPLC-DAD-QToF-MS, resulting in the rapid characterization of metabolites of interest from cultures of two isolates. After evaluation of key molecular features, unique or unusual bacterial metabolites were annotated and are reported herein.

Indexed as

PhylogenyRhizosphereBacteriaBiological ProductsDNA, BacterialMetabolomeMetabolomicsPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologyBiological ProductsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SallelochemicalsBrassica napuschemical diversityin situ isolationLC-DAD-QToF-MSnatural productsnext generation sequencingrhizochiprhizospheresoil microbiota

Identifiers

PMID31117282
PMCPMC6571749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.