Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31117180›Full record

ReviewNutrients2019

Choline and DHA in Maternal and Infant Nutrition: Synergistic Implications in Brain and Eye Health.

Jonathan G Mun, LeeCole L Legette, Chioma J Ikonte, Susan H Mitmesser

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. External Disruption of Ocular DevelopmentThe Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Association ofNutrients · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Choline supplements: An update.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan G MunScience & Technology, Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA. jmun@pharmavite.net.
LeeCole L LegetteScience & Technology, Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA. llegette@pharmavite.net.
Chioma J IkonteScience & Technology, Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA. cikonte@pharmavite.net.
Susan H MitmesserScience & Technology, Pharmavite LLC, West Hills, CA 91304, USA. smitmesser@pharmavite.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to highlight current insights into the roles of choline and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in maternal and infant nutrition, with special emphasis on dietary recommendations, gaps in dietary intake, and synergistic implications of both nutrients in infant brain and eye development. Adequate choline and DHA intakes are not being met by the vast majority of US adults, and even more so by women of child-bearing age. Choline and DHA play a significant role in infant brain and eye development, with inadequate intakes leading to visual and neurocognitive deficits. Emerging findings illustrate synergistic interactions between choline and DHA, indicating that insufficient intakes of one or both could have lifelong deleterious impacts on both maternal and infant health.

Indexed as

Infant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBrainCholineDocosahexaenoic AcidsEyeFemaleHumansInfantCholineDocosahexaenoic Acidsbrain healthcholineDHAdocosahexaenoic acideye functioninfant nutritionpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31117180
PMCPMC6566660
OpenAlexW2945434279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.