ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2019
Association between Growth Differentiation Factor 15 and Non-Dipping Circadian Pattern in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Essential Hypertension.
Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Growth differentiation factor 15: from stress response to clinical utility in chronic liver diseases.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Article
- Hyperactive behaviour of growth differentiation factor- 15 (GDF-15) in conjunction with iron trafficking transporters and suppression of Nrf-2 gene in diabetes and metabolic syndrome.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNon-dipper hypertension (HT) confers greater risk compared with dipper HT. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) recently emerged as a novel and independent marker of cardiovascular disease, both in diagnostic and prognostic scopes. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship of circadian blood pressure (BP) pattern with serum GDF-15 level in newly diagnosed HT patients without left ventricular hypertrophy. SUBJECTS AND
methodsNewly diagnosed non-dipper (n = 66) and dipper (n = 60) HT patients were selected according to 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The controls comprised healthy normotensive subjects (n = 31). Data was collected through physical examination, laboratory analysis, ABPM, and echocardiography. GDF-15 was measured using ELISA.
resultsGreater GDF-15 level was found in the non-dippers compared with the dippers and the controls (557.53 ± 91.7, 513.79 ± 62.86, and 494.44 ± 79.30 ng/L, respectively, p < 0.001). In bivariate linear correlation analysis, GDF-15 correlated positively with glomerular filtration rate (r = 0.180, p =0.030), total cholesterol (r = 0.170, p = 0.038), septal E/E' ratio (r = 0.344, p = 0.001), lateral E/E' ratio (r = 0.366, p < 0.001), nighttime systolic BP (r = 0.166, p = 0.046), and nighttime diastolic BP (r = 0.188, p = 0.024); however, it correlated negatively with septal and lateral E' velocities (r = 0.268, p = 0.005 and r = 0.236, p = 0.013, respectively). Furthermore, GDF-15 level and nighttime diastolic BP remained independently associated with non-dipper HT. In ROC analysis, optimal cutoff value for GDF-15 was 524.6 ng/L with 56.7% sensitivity and 72.4% specificity (AUC: 0.676, 95% CI: 0.580-0.772, p < 0.05).
conclusionOur results showed GDF-15 upregulation in the non-dipper HT group. GDF-15 and nighttime diastolic BP were independently associated with the non-dipping pattern. This study may suggest possible utilization of GDF-15 in the prediction of non-dipper HT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.