Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31116875›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2019

Characterisation of P2Y

Markie O Muoboghare, Robert M Drummond, Charles Kennedy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Purinergic Receptor P2Y2 Regulates Neurogenesis and Functional Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury in Zebrafish.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Guidelines for evaluating endothelial function in vascular tissue.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of the Purinergic P2Y2 Receptor in Pulmonary Hypertension.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. PJournal of pain research · 2020
    Article
  14. Characterisation of P2YBritish journal of pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markie O MuoboghareStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Robert M DrummondStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Charles KennedyStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9661-5437
University of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere is a lack of potent, selective antagonists at most subtypes of P2Y receptor. The aims of this study were to characterise the pharmacological properties of the proposed P2Y EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Cell lines expressing native or recombinant P2Y receptors were superfused constantly, and agonist-induced changes in intracellular Ca KEY

resultsUTP evoked a concentration-dependent rise in intracellular Ca CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: AR-C118925XX is a potent, selective and reversible, competitive P2Y

Indexed as

Cell LineEndothelial CellsEndothelium, VascularFuransHumansPiperidinesPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2Y2TetrazolesARC 118925XXFuransPiperidinesPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2Y2Tetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID31116875
PMCPMC6637037
OpenAlexW2946106480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.