Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31116690›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Human papillomavirus genotypes and infection among women in Changzhou, China.

Yan Geng, Liyan Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan Genga Department of Blood Transfusion, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Changzhou , China.
Liyan Liua Department of Blood Transfusion, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Changzhou , China.ORCID 0000-0001-5841-4351
Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a major cause of cervical cancer. HPV vaccine has been shown to be highly effective in preventing HPV infection, and understanding the genotypes of HPV infection can guide the utilization of HPV vaccine. This epidemiological study aimed to investigate the genotype distribution of HPV in HPV-positive female patients in Changzhou. This study enrolled HPV-positive female patients admitted at the Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled in this study. HPV genotypes were identified via standard HPV DNA testing. The cohort comprised 5738 patients, that the predominant genotypes were HPV52 (13.4%), HPV16 (9.6%), HPV58 (8.8%), HPV81 (8.6%), and HPV53 (7.7%). HPV infection prevalence was the highest among those aged 41-45 y (16.6%), followed by those aged 31-35 y (15.1%) and 36-40 y (15.1%). In total, 46.8% of infections were found in women aged 31-45 y. The main genotypes of HPV infection upon physical examination or diagnosis of cervicitis and cervical cancer were HPV52, 16, 58, 81, and 53. HPV52, 16, 58, 81, and 53 are the most predominant genotypes of HPV infection. Further, HPV infection is most prevalent among women aged 31-45 y. Our findings provide experimental evidence for guiding HPV vaccination policy.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdolescentAdultAgedChinaDNA, ViralFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPrevalenceUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultDNA, ViralgenotypesHPVHPV infectionHPV vaccination

Identifiers

PMID31116690
PMCPMC6746503
OpenAlexW2946135676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.