ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019
A scoping review of interventions for vaccine stock management in primary health-care facilities.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into immunization practices: community health nurses' experiences at Fanteakwa North District child welfare clinics.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Primary Health Care structure and vaccination coverage in Brazilian municipalities.Revista de saude publica · 2025Article
- Leveraging AI to optimize vaccines supply chain and logistics in Africa: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Improving the last mile delivery of vaccines through an informed push model: Experiences, opportunities and costs based on an implementation study in a rural district in Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Cost analysis of an innovative eHealth program in Nigeria: a case study of the vaccine direct delivery system.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Perceptions of and Practical Experience with the National Surveillance Centre in Managing Medicines Availability Amongst Users within Public Healthcare Facilities in South Africa: Findings and Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Improving the availability of vaccines in primary healthcare facilities in South Africa: is the time right for a system redesign process?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Mobile reporting of vaccine stock-levels in primary health care facilities in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa: perceptions and experiences of health care workers.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Experts' opinion for improving global adolescent vaccination rates: a call to action.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the challenges facing the success of immunization programs is shortages of vaccines at health facilities, which could result from inadequate vaccine stock management. Several approaches have been designed by countries to improve vaccine stock management. This review summarizes currently available information on interventions for vaccine stock management.We considered both randomized trials and non-randomized studies eligible for inclusion in this review. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization Library Information System, Web of Science, and PDQ-Evidence. We searched the websites of the World Health Organization, Global Alliance for Vaccine and Immunization, PATH's Vaccine Resources Library, and United Nations Children's Fund. The reference lists of all the included studies were also searched. Two authors independently screened search outputs, reviewed full texts of potentially eligible articles, evaluated risk of bias, and extracted data; resolving disagreements through consensus.Four studies met our inclusion criteria (three before-after studies and one randomized trial). Three studies were conducted in low- and middle-income countries while one was conducted in Canada (a high-income country). All the studies had various limitations and were classified as having a high risk of bias. Study findings suggest that the use of digital information systems to improve information and stock visibility, coupled with other interventions (such as training of health-care workers on the use of innovative tools and redesign of the supply chain to tackle certain bottlenecks), has the potential to increase vaccine availability, reduce response times, and improve the quality of vaccine records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.