Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31116500›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Women's health literacy and the complex decision-making process to use complementary medicine products in pregnancy and lactation.

Larisa A J Barnes, Lesley Barclay, Kirsten McCaffery, Parisa Aslani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Insights into how Malaysian adults with limited health literacy self-manage and live with asthma: A Photovoice qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Women's health literacy and the complex decision-making process to use complementary medicine products in pregnancy and lactation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Larisa A J BarnesSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9847-775X
Lesley BarclayUniversity Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9345-3468
Kirsten McCafferySchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2696-5006
Parisa AslaniSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7976-8236

Funding

Blackmores LtdUniversity of Sydney
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about women's decision-making processes regarding using complementary medicine products (CMPs) during pregnancy or lactation.

objectivesTo explore the decision-making processes of women choosing to use CMPs in pregnancy and lactation; and to investigate how women's health literacy influences their decisions. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsIn-depth interviews and focus group discussions were held with twenty-five pregnant and/or breastfeeding women. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsKey to women's decision making was the desire to establish a CMPs safety and to receive information from a trustworthy source, preferably their most trusted health-care practitioner. Women wanted positive therapeutic relationships with health-care practitioners and to be highly involved in the decisions they made for the health of themselves and their children. Two overarching components of the decision-making process were identified: (a) women's information needs and (b) a preference for CMP use. Women collated and assessed information from other health-care practitioners, other mothers and published research during their decision-making processes. They showed a strong preference for CMP use to support their pregnancy and breastfeeding health, and that of their unborn and breastfeeding babies. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsComplex decision-making processes to use CMPs in pregnancy and lactation were identified. The participants showed high levels of communicative and critical health literacy skills in their decision-making processes. These skills supported women's complex decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAdultComplementary TherapiesDecision MakingDietary SupplementsFemaleFocus GroupsHerbal MedicineHumansInterviews as TopicLactationPregnancyYoung Adultcomplementary therapiesdietary supplementshealth literacyherbal medicineinformation seeking behaviourlactationpatient-provider relationshippregnancyqualitative researchself-care

Identifiers

PMID31116500
PMCPMC6803395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.