Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31116473›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2020

High-efficient and precise base editing of C•G to T•A in the allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Lei Qin, Jianying Li, Qiongqiong Wang, Zhongping Xu, Lin Sun, Muna Alariqi, Hakim Manghwar, Guanyin Wang, Bo Li, Xiao Ding and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Speed breeding in upland cotton (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances and Applications of Plant Base Editing Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Genome editing in grain legumes for food security.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lei QinNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jianying LiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qiongqiong WangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhongping XuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lin SunNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Muna AlariqiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hakim ManghwarNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Guanyin WangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Bo LiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiao DingNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hangping RuiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huimei HuangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tianliang LuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Keith LindseyDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Henry DaniellDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4485-1176
Xianlong ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-524X
Shuangxia JinNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1495-9154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The base-editing technique using CRISPR/nCas9 (Cas9 nickase) or dCas9 (deactivated Cas9) fused with cytidine deaminase is a powerful tool to create point mutations. In this study, a novel G. hirsutum-Base Editor 3 (GhBE3) base-editing system has been developed to create single-base mutations in the allotetraploid genome of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). A cytidine deaminase sequence (APOBEC) fused with nCas9 and uracil glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) was inserted into our CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid (pRGEB32-GhU6.7). Three target sites were chosen for two target genes, GhCLA and GhPEBP, to test the efficiency and accuracy of GhBE3. The editing efficiency ranged from 26.67 to 57.78% at the three target sites. Targeted deep sequencing revealed that the C→T substitution efficiency within an 'editing window', approximately six-nucleotide windows of -17 to -12 bp from the PAM sequence, was up to 18.63% of the total sequences. The 27 most likely off-target sites predicted by CRISPR-P and Cas-OFFinder tools were analysed by targeted deep sequencing, and it was found that rare C→T substitutions (average < 0.1%) were detected in the editing windows of these sites. Furthermore, whole-genome sequencing analyses on two GhCLA-edited and one wild-type plants with about 100× depth showed that no bona fide off-target mutations were detectable from 1500 predicted potential off-target sites across the genome. In addition, the edited bases were inherited to T1 progeny. These results demonstrate that GhBE3 has high specificity and accuracy for the generation of targeted point mutations in allotetraploid cotton.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGossypiumMutationTetraploidybase editingcotton (Gossypium hirsutum)CRISPR/nCas9 (Cas9 nickase)cytidine deaminase (rAPOBEC1)off-target

Identifiers

PMID31116473
PMCPMC6920158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.