Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31116312›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2019

Segmental resection combined with anoplasty for the treatment of circumferential mixed hemorrhoids.

Jing Wu, Keqiang Yu, Changyao Lv, Wenzhu Lu, Hongbo He

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing WuDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3598-4663
Keqiang YuDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2704-1569
Changyao LvDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-3561
Wenzhu LuDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-5157
Hongbo HeDepartment of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-6858
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circumferential mixed hemorrhoids are very difficult to treat non-surgically. Therefore, it is important to explore the surgical methods for its complete resolution as well as maintenance of normal anal anatomy and function. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of segmented and plastic hemorrhoidectomy (SPH) on patients with circumferential mixed hemorrhoids. A total of 300 patients with circumferential mixed hemorrhoids were divided into experimental group (n=150) undergoing SPH and control group (n=150) undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. There were no differences in cure and effectiveness rates between two groups. Compared with the control group, patients in the experimental group had shorter healing time (15.7±1.3 vs 12.5±0.7 days) and recovery to normal activity (18.5±2.7 vs 14.7±1.2 days). In addition, anal function of all patients in the experimental group was normal during short- and long-term follow-up. However, more cases in the control group showed anal dampness and itching, and poor control of intestinal liquid. Compared with the control group, patients in the experimental group had better outcomes in overall anal function and smoothness at 6, 12, and 18 months after operation as well as patient satisfaction. Furthermore, the rating in the visual analogue scale for defecation pain and edema in the experimental group was less than that in the control group. SPH was more effective, had fewer complications, better protection of anal function, and a better cosmetic result.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemorrhoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsSeverity of Illness IndexSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31116312
PMCPMC6526753
OpenAlexW2946644906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.