Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31116258›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)

Genome-wide DNA methylation profile in the peripheral blood of cocaine and crack dependents.

Caroline Camilo, Mariana Maschietto, Henrique C Vieira, Ana C Tahira, Gisele R Gouveia, Ana C Feio Dos Santos, André B Negrão, Marcelo Ribeiro, Ronaldo Laranjeira, Homero Vallada and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline CamiloDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7183-7754
Mariana MaschiettoLaboratório Nacional de Biociências (LNBio), Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Henrique C VieiraDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana C TahiraDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gisele R GouveiaDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana C Feio Dos SantosDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
André B NegrãoDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo RibeiroUnidade de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas (UNIAD), Departamento de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ronaldo LaranjeiraUnidade de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas (UNIAD), Departamento de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Homero ValladaDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Helena BrentaniDepartamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCocaine use disorders (CUDs) represent a major public health problem in many countries. To better understand the interaction between the environmental modulations and phenotype, the aim of the present study was to investigate the DNA methylation pattern of CUD patients, who had concomitant cocaine and crack dependence, and healthy controls.

methodsWe studied DNA methylation profiles in the peripheral blood of 23 CUD patients and 24 healthy control subjects using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip arrays.

resultsComparison between CUD patients and controls revealed 186 differentially methylated positions (DMPs; adjusted p-value [adjP] < 10-5) related to 152 genes, with a subset of CpGs confirmed by pyrosequencing. DNA methylation patterns discriminated CUD patients and control groups. A gene network approach showed that the EHMT1, EHMT2, MAPK1, MAPK3, MAP2K1, and HDAC5 genes, which are involved in transcription and chromatin regulation cellular signaling pathways, were also associated with cocaine dependence.

conclusionThe investigation of DNA methylation patterns may contribute to a better understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in CUD.

Indexed as

Crack CocaineDNA MethylationAdultCase-Control StudiesCocaine-Related DisordersGene Regulatory NetworksGenome-Wide Association StudyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistocompatibility AntigensHistone DeacetylasesHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansLinear ModelsMaleMAP Kinase Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Crack CocaineEHMT1 protein, humanEHMT2 protein, humanHDAC5 protein, humanHistocompatibility AntigensHistone DeacetylasesHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseMAPK1 protein, humanMAPK3 protein, humanMAP Kinase Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3

Identifiers

PMID31116258
PMCPMC6899365
OpenAlexW2944916703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.