ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2019
Shared decision making: Does a physician's decision-making style affect patient participation in treatment choices for primary immunodeficiency?
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure-process-outcome model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Pooled it
- The State of Shared Decision-Making in Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Narrative Review and Health Care Provider Perspective.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the surgical informed consent for elective and emergency surgeries in obstetrics and gynaecology in Saudi Arabia.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcomes with subcutaneous immunoglobulin in secondary immunodeficiency.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Customizing subcutaneous immunoglobulin administration in primary antibody deficiency: patient-centric care perspectives.Immunotherapy · 2024Review
- Exploring the Decision-Making Process of People Living with HIV Enrolled in Antiretroviral Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study of Decisions Guided by Trust and Emotions.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2023Article
- How much the leg length has changed after the MOUKA through measurement of the full length radiographs? Beware of splicing error.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- The Practice of Shared Decision-Making Among Physiotherapists and Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Review
- Shared Decision Making and Choice for Bariatric Surgery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Shared decision making: Does a physician's decision-making style affect patient participation in treatment choices for primary immunodeficiency?Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overall health care spending in the United States is equivalent to more than 15% of GDP, yet outcomes rank below the top 25 in most quality categories when compared with other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. The majority of spending is consumed by small patient populations with chronic diseases. Experts believe increased patient-physician shared decision making (SDM) should result in better overall longitudinal care but understanding the physician's role in facilitating SDM is limited. Structural equation modelling was applied to results of a 2016 questionnaire-based survey of 330 US physicians who treat approximately 55% of primary immune deficiency requiring immune globulin therapy; it tested the relationship between slow/rational vs fast/intuitive decision-making styles and SDM as mediated by patient-centric care and moderated by physician's trust in the patient. The results showed a statistically significant relationship between slow/rational decision making and SDM. The results also suggest differences related to age, gender, education, and race but no differences related to trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.