Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115896›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2019

Budget Impact Analysis of Molecular Lymph Node Staging Versus Conventional Histopathology Staging in Colorectal Carcinoma.

Sherley Diaz-Mercedes, Ivan Archilla, Jordi Camps, Antonio de Lacy, Iñigo Gorostiaga, Dulce Momblan, Ainitze Ibarzabal, Joan Maurel, Nuria Chic, Josep Antoni Bombí and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sherley Diaz-MercedesPathology Department-Center of Biomedical Diagnosis (CDB), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5509-5284
Ivan ArchillaPathology Department-Center of Biomedical Diagnosis (CDB), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi CampsGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio de LacySurgical Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Iñigo GorostiagaPathology Department, Araba University Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Dulce MomblanSurgical Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Ainitze IbarzabalSurgical Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan MaurelMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria ChicMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Antoni BombíPathology Department-Center of Biomedical Diagnosis (CDB), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc BalaguerGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni CastellsGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-2033
Iban AldecoaPathology Department-Center of Biomedical Diagnosis (CDB), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5774-7453
Josep Maria BorrasDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miriam CuatrecasasPathology Department-Center of Biomedical Diagnosis (CDB), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. mcuatrec@clinic.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-3063-0110
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario Araba · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2017SGR00735Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2017SGR653Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas SAF2014-54453-RFundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer GCB13131592CASTInstituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/01304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of lymph node (LN) metastasis is a critical prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and is also an indicator for adjuvant chemotherapy. The gold standard (GS) technique for LN diagnosis and staging is based on the analysis of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides, but its sensitivity is low. As a result, patients may not be properly diagnosed and some may have local recurrence or distant metastases after curative-intent surgery. Many of these diagnostic and treatment problems could be avoided if the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay (OSNA) was used rather than the GS technique. OSNA is a fast, automated, standardised, highly sensitive, quantitative technique for detecting LN metastases.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the budget impact of introducing OSNA LN analysis in early-stage CRC patients in the Spanish National Health System (NHS).

methodsA budget impact analysis comparing two scenarios (GS vs. OSNA) was developed within the Spanish NHS framework over a 3-year time frame (2017-2019). The patient population consisted of newly diagnosed CRC patients undergoing surgical treatment, and the following costs were included: initial surgery, pathological diagnosis, staging, follow-up expenses, systemic treatment and surgery after recurrence. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

resultsUsing OSNA instead of the GS would have saved €1,509,182, €6,854,501 and €10,814,082 during the first, second and third years of the analysis, respectively, because patients incur additional costs in later years, leading to savings of more than €19 million for the NHS over the 3-year time horizon.

conclusionsIntroducing OSNA in CRC LN analysis may represent not only an economic benefit for the NHS but also a clinical benefit for CRC patients since a more accurate staging could be performed, thus avoiding unnecessary treatments.

Indexed as

BudgetsColorectal NeoplasmsCost SavingsHealth Care CostsHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm StagingNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificitySpain

Identifiers

PMID31115896
PMCPMC6748889
OpenAlexW2945032757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.