ArticleRadiological physics and technology2019
Evaluation of a new commercial automated planning software for tangential breast intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of target coverage priority levels on dose homogeneity in commercial automated field-in-field planning for breast radiotherapy.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Automated treatment planning for whole breast irradiation with individualized tangential IMRT fields.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided whole-breast irradiation using automated planning.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022Article
- Evaluation of robustness in hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans generated by commercial software for automated breast planning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Assessing the performance of an automated breast treatment planning software.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Dosimetric evaluation of deep inspiration breath hold for left-sided breast cancer: analysis of patient-specific parameters related to heart dose reduction.Journal of radiation research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated treatment planning may decrease the effort required in planning and promote increased routine clinical use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for many breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new commercial automated planning software for tangential breast IMRT by comparing it with clinical plans from whole-breast irradiation. We prospectively enrolled 150 patients with Stage 0-1 breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery at our institution between September 2016 and August 2017. Total doses of 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions (n = 98) or 50 Gy in 25 fractions (n = 44) were used. All treatment plans were retrospectively re-planned using the automated breast planning (ABP) software. All automated plans generated clinically deliverable beam parameters with no patient body collision and no contralateral breast pass through. The mean homogeneity index of the automatically generated clinical target volume, percentage volume of lungs receiving dose more than 20 Gy, mean heart dose, and dose to the highest irradiated 2-cc volumes of the irradiated volume were 0.077 ± 0.019, 4.2% ± 1.2%, 142 ± 69 cGy, and 105.8% ± 1.7% (prescribed dose: 100%), respectively. The mean planning time was 4.8 ± 1.4 min. The ABP software demonstrated high clinical acceptability and treatment planning cost efficiency for tangential breast IMRT. The ABP software may be useful for delivering high-quality treatment to a majority of patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31115835What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.