Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115733›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2019

2-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-3-((Piperidin-1-yl)ethyl)thiazolidin-4-One-Loaded Polymeric Nanocapsules: In Vitro Antiglioma Activity and In Vivo Toxicity Evaluation.

Elita Ferreira da Silveira, Luana Mota Ferreira, Mailine Gehrcke, Letícia Cruz, Nathália Stark Pedra, Priscila Treptow Ramos, Natália Pontes Bona, Mayara Sandrielly Pereira Soares, Rodrigo Rodrigues, Rosélia Maria Spanevello and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elita Ferreira da SilveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. elitafs24@hotmail.com.
Luana Mota FerreiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Mailine GehrckePrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Letícia CruzPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Nathália Stark PedraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Priscila Treptow RamosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Natália Pontes BonaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Mayara Sandrielly Pereira SoaresPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Rodrigo RodriguesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Rosélia Maria SpanevelloPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Wilson CunicoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Francieli M StefanelloPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica e Bioprospecção, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Juliana Hofstatter AzambujaDepartamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Rua Sarmento Leite, 245 - Prédio Principal - sala 304, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP: 90.050-170, Brazil. julianaha@ufcspa.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2416-7724
Ana Paula HornPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Elizandra BraganholDepartamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Rua Sarmento Leite, 245 - Prédio Principal - sala 304, Porto Alegre, RS, CEP: 90.050-170, Brazil. ebraganhol@ufcspa.edu.br.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among gliomas types, glioblastoma is considered the most malignant and the worst form of primary brain tumor. It is characterized by high infiltration rate and great angiogenic capacity. The presence of an inflammatory microenvironment contributes to chemo/radioresistance, resulting in poor prognosis for patients. Recent data show that thiazolidinones have a wide range of pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory and antiglioma activities. Nanocapsules of biodegradable polymers become an alternative to cancer treatment since they provide targeted drug delivery and could overcome blood-brain barrier. Therefore, here we investigated the in vitro antiglioma activity and the potential in vivo toxicity of 2- (2-methoxyphenyl) -3- ((piperidin-1-yl) ethyl) thiazolidin-4-one-loaded polymeric nanocapsules (4L-N). Nanocapsules were prepared and characterized in terms of particle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, pH, molecule content and encapsulation efficiency. Treatment with 4L-N selectively decreased human U138MG and rat C6 cell lines viability and proliferation, being even more efficient than the free-form molecule (4L). In addition, 4L-N did not promote toxicity to primary astrocytes. We further demonstrated that the treatment with sub-therapeutic dose of 4L-N did not alter weight, neither resulted in mortality, toxicity or peripheral damage to Wistar rats. Finally, 4L as well as 4L-N did not alter makers of oxidative damage, such as TBARS levels and total sulfhydryl content, and did not change antioxidant enzymes SOD and CAT activity in liver and brain of treated rats. Taken together, these data indicate that the nanoencapsulation of 4L has potentiated its antiglioma effect and does not cause in vivo toxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisAstrocytesBiomarkers, TumorBrainBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDrug LiberationGliomaHumansLightLiverMaleNanocapsulesBiomarkers, TumorNanocapsulesPiperidinesPolymersThiazolidinesThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesAstrocytesC6 gliomaNanocapsulesThiazolidinonesToxicityU138MG glioma

Identifiers

PMID31115733
PMCPMC11462846
OpenAlexW2945560274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.