Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115698›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2019

Diabetes and the Built Environment: Evidence and Policies.

Aisha T Amuda, Seth A Berkowitz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Rethinking diabetes in the United States.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes.Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aisha T AmudaUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, 1001 Bondurant Hall, CB 9535, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Seth A BerkowitzDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Chapel Hill School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, 5034 Old Clinic Bldg. CB 7110, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. seth_berkowitz@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Understanding & Overcoming Food Insecurity in Diabetes PatientsK23DK109200 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERKOWITZ, SETH A · 2016 to 2020
$973k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK109200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo explore the relationship between the built environment and type 2 diabetes, considering both risk factors and policies to reduce risk. The built environment refers to the physical characteristics of the areas in which people live including buildings, streets, open spaces, and infrastructure. RECENT

findingsA review of current literature suggests an association between the built environment and type 2 diabetes, likely driven by two key pathways-physical activity and the food environment. Other hypothesized mechanisms linking the built environment and type 2 diabetes include housing policy, but evidence in these areas is underdeveloped. Policies designed to enhance the built environment for diabetes risk reduction are mechanistically plausible, but as of yet, little direct evidence supports their effectiveness in reducing in type 2 diabetes risk. Future work should rigorously evaluate policies meant to reduce type 2 diabetes via the built environment.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Environment DesignExerciseHousingHumansPolicyBuilt environmentDiabetes riskHealth policyType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID31115698
PMCPMC7720805
OpenAlexW2945359794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.