Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115627›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Safety of exposure to high static magnetic fields (2 T-12 T): a study on mice.

Shenghang Wang, Jie Luo, Huanhuan Lv, Zhihao Zhang, Jiancheng Yang, Dandan Dong, Yanwen Fang, Lijiang Hu, Mengyu Liu, Zhongcai Liao and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Shenghang WangResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Jie LuoResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Huanhuan LvResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Zhihao ZhangResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Jiancheng YangResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Dandan DongResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Yanwen FangZhejiang Heye Health Technology Co., Ltd., Anji, Huzhou, China.
Lijiang HuZhejiang Heye Health Technology Co., Ltd., Anji, Huzhou, China.
Mengyu LiuZhejiang Heye Health Technology Co., Ltd., Anji, Huzhou, China.
Zhongcai LiaoZhejiang Heye Health Technology Co., Ltd., Anji, Huzhou, China.
Jun LiZhejiang Heye Health Technology Co., Ltd., Anji, Huzhou, China.
Zhicai FangZhejiang Heye Health Technology Co., Ltd., Anji, Huzhou, China.
Yunpeng WeiResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Wei HanResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Atik Badshah ShaikhResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Dachuan YinResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China.
Peng ShangResearch & Development Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518057, China. shangpeng@nwpu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-6240

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51777171Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality of China JCYJ20170412140904406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to evaluate the biological effects of high static magnetic field (HiSMF, 2-12 Tesla [T]) exposure on mice in a stable and effective breeding environment in the chamber of a superconducting magnet.

methodsC57BL/6 mice were bred in the geomagnetic field and HiSMF with different magnetic field strengths (2-4 T, 6-8 T, and 10-12 T) for 28 days. The body weight, blood indices, organ coefficients, and histomorphology of major organs were analyzed.

resultsThe results showed that the HiSMF had no significant effect on the body weight, organ coefficients, or histomorphology of major organs in mice. The HiSMF had no effect on most routine blood and biochemical indices, but the value of the mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) was increased in the 2-4 T group compared with that of the other groups, and the uric acid level (UA) was decreased in the three HiSMF groups compared with that of the control group.

conclusionThe C57BL/6 mice were not affected when they were exposed to different HiSMF environments for 28 days. KEY POINTS: • No physiological problems were observed in mice with long-term whole-body exposure to HiSMF.

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsRadiation ExposureAnimalsBody WeightMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalMagnetic fieldsMice, inbred C57BLOrgan sizeSafety managementStaining and labeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.