ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
Evaluation of EGFR mutations in NSCLC with highly sensitive droplet digital PCR assays.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of the conventional and novel methods in testing EGFR variants for NSCLC patients in the last 10 years through different regions: a systematic review.Molecular biology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Droplet Digital PCR and Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in Cell-Free DNA of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- CRISPR-Based Fluorescent Reporter (CBFR) Assay for Sensitive, Specific, Inexpensive, and Visual Detection of a Specific EGFR Exon 19 Deletion in NSCLC.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Article
- Efficacy of different platforms in detecting EGFR mutations using cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA from non-small-cell lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- Early On-Treatment Prediction of the Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Cancers · 2022Article
- Quantitative detections of TP53 gene mutations improve the diagnosis and prognostic prediction of biliary tract cancers using droplet digital PCR.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Article
- Plasma-based early screening and monitoring of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients by a 3-color digital PCR assay.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Simultaneous Single Cell Gene Expression and EGFR Mutation Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Reveals Distinct Phenotypes in NSCLC.Advanced biosystems · 2020Article
- From precision medicine to imprecision medicine through limited diagnostic ability to detect low allelic frequency mutations.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
- [Clinical Value of Droplet Digital PCR and Super-ARMS Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation in Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020Article
- A CRISPR Test for Rapidly and Sensitively Detecting Circulating EGFR Mutations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted drugs have been widely used in the treatment of patients with lung cancer, particularly for those with non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Plasma cell‑free DNA is an emerging clinical tool for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation in patients with lung cancer. Detection of circulating tumor (ct) DNA by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a highly sensitive and minimally invasive alternative for the assessment and management of cancer. In the present study, four ddPCR systems were developed to detect the 19DELs, L858R, T790M and C797S mutations of the EGFR gene in plasma ctDNA samples, and all exhibited higher sensitivity compared with the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)‑PCR assays. The results revealed that the sensitivity of the ddPCR assays for the four major types of EGFR mutant reached 0.04%. In total, 50 plasma ctDNA samples were collected from patients with NSCLC to detect the 19DELs, L858R, T790M and C797S mutations by ddPCR and ARMS‑PCR. All the mutations except for C797S were detected and the concordance rates between ddPCR and ARMS‑PCR were 96% (19DELs), 98% (L858R) and 100% (T790M). The fraction of EGFR mutation ranged from 0.43 to 68.07% using the ddPCR method. Therefore, the present study suggests that the four ddPCR testing systems could be used for early detection of EGFR mutations in plasma samples, so that patients can better select the targeted drugs according to the EGFR mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.