Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115526›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019

Effect of passaging on the stemness of infrapatellar fat pad‑derived stem cells and potential role of nucleostemin as a prognostic marker of impaired stemness.

Subathra Radhakrishnan, Omana Anna Trentz, Catherine Ann Martin, Mettu Srinivas Reddy, Mohamed Rela, Marimuthu Chinnarasu, Narayana Kalkura, Shanmugaapriya Sellathamby

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Subathra RadhakrishnanNational Foundation for Liver Research, Cell Laboratory, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai 600100, India.
Omana Anna TrentzMIOT Institute of Research, MIOT International, Chennai 600089, India.
Catherine Ann MartinNational Foundation for Liver Research, Cell Laboratory, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai 600100, India.
Mettu Srinivas ReddyNational Foundation for Liver Research, Cell Laboratory, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai 600100, India.
Mohamed RelaNational Foundation for Liver Research, Cell Laboratory, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai 600100, India.
Marimuthu ChinnarasuInstitute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Gleneagles Global Health City, Chennai 600100, India.
Narayana KalkuraCrystal Growth Centre, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India.
Shanmugaapriya SellathambyDepartment of Biomedical Science, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli 620024, India.
Anna University, Chennai · INBharathidasan University · INMadras Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infrapatellar fat pad‑derived stem cells (IFPSCs) are emerging as an alternative to adipose tissue‑derived stem cells (ADSCs) from other sources. They are a reliable source of autologous stem cells obtained from medical waste that are suitable for use in cell‑based therapy, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Such clinical applications require a vast number of high‑quality IFPSCs. Unlike embryonic stem cells (ESCs), ADSCs and IFPSCs have limited population doubling capacity; however, in vitro expansion of primary IFPSCs through multiple passages (referred to as P) is a crucial step to acquire the desired population of cells. The present study investigated the effect of multiple passages on the stemness of IFPSCs during expansion and the possibility of predicting the loss of stemness using certain markers. IFPSCs were isolated from infrapatellar fat pad tissue resected during knee arthroplasty performed on aged patients (>65 years old). These cells from the stromal vascular fraction were serially passaged to at least to P7, and their stemness characteristics were examined at each passage. It was observed that IFPSCs maintained their spindle‑shaped morphology, self‑renewability and homogeneity at P2‑4. Furthermore, immunostaining revealed that these cells expressed mesenchymal stem cell (CD166, CD90 and CD105) and ESC markers [Sox2, Nanog, Oct4 and nucleostemin (NS)], whereas the hematopoietic stem cell marker CD45 was absent. These cells were also able to differentiate into the three germ layer cell types, thus confirming their ability to generate clinical grade cells. The findings indicated that prolonged culture of IFPSCs (P>6) led to the loss of the stem cell proliferative marker NS, with an increased population doubling time and progression toward neuronal differentiation, acquiring a neurogenic phenotype. Additionally, IFPSCs demonstrated an inherent ability to secrete neurotrophic factors and express receptors for these factors, which is the cause of neuronal differentiation at later passages. Therefore, these findings validated NS as a prognostic indicator for impaired stemness and identified IFPSCs as a promising source for cell‑based therapy, particularly for neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAdipose TissueAgedCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell Self RenewalGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGTP-Binding ProteinsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsNerve Growth FactorsNeurodegenerative DiseasesNuclear ProteinsPatellaPrognosisBiomarkersGNL3 protein, humanGTP-Binding ProteinsNerve Growth FactorsNuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31115526
PMCPMC6579983
OpenAlexW2946558947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.