Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115468›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropathology and experimental neurology2019

Pituitary Adenoma in Pediatric and Adolescent Populations.

Jie Chen, Robert E Schmidt, Sonika Dahiya

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Grading and staging for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. GIGANTISM AND ACROMEGALY THROUGH HISTORY.Acta clinica Croatica · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. PD-L1 and tumor-infiltrating CD8Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie ChenDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.
Robert E SchmidtDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.
Sonika DahiyaDivision of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenomas are rare in children and adolescents and although mostly benign, they can sometimes be challenging to manage due to their locally invasive nature. In this study, we examined the clinicopathologic features of 42 pituitary adenomas in patients ≤21 years of age. The youngest patient was 8 years old (median age: 18 years), and the female-to-male ratio was 1.8:1. Five patients had recurrence after resection. There was no obvious difference between the recurrent rates in the typical (11.7%) and atypical adenomas (12.5%) based on the 2004 WHO classification. However, the recurrence rate was much higher in adenomas with an elevated proliferation index of ≥3% (20.8%) or with evidence of local invasion (18.2%). Adenomas with combination of an elevated proliferation index of ≥3% and imaging evidence of local invasion had the highest recurrence rate of 25%. In summary, pituitary adenomas are more frequent in adolescents as compared with children and are more common in girls. An elevated proliferation index of ≥3% and evidence of local invasion on imaging seem to correlate with a high probability of recurrence. Furthermore, we observe rarity of α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) protein loss (surrogate to ATRX mutation) in these tumors without any connotation on prognosis.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdolescentAge DistributionCell ProliferationChildFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPituitary NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSex CharacteristicsX-linked Nuclear ProteinYoung AdultATRX protein, humanX-linked Nuclear ProteinATRXatypicalclinicopathologic featuresinvasivepediatricpituitary neuroendocrine neoplasmprognosisWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID31115468
PMCPMC6581558
OpenAlexW2945789323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.