Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115387›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Adverse events with lumen-apposing metal stents in endoscopic gallbladder drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Babu P Mohan, Ravishankar Asokkumar, Mohammed Shakhatreh, Rajat Garg, Suresh Ponnada, Udayakumar Navaneethan, Douglas G Adler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary interventions.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Doubling-down: LAMS-in-LAMS rescue of a migrated cholecystogastrostomy stent.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Endoscopic ultrasound in the management of acute cholecystitis: Practical review.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Successful minimally invasive management of adverse events following EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in a suboptimal surgical patient.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  16. [Palliative endoscopy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Endoscopic Methods for Gallbladder Drainage.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Babu P MohanInpatient Medicine, Banner University Medical Center/ University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Ravishankar AsokkumarDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Mohammed ShakhatrehDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Rapides Regional Medical Center, Alexandria, Louisiana, USA.
Rajat GargDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Suresh PonnadaDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.
Udayakumar NavaneethanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Douglas G AdlerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson · USAdventHealth Orlando · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are rapidly being used in endoscopic interventional drainage procedures and have started to replace the self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs). Its use in gallbladder drainage (GBD) is limited by lack of good-quality studies, and data are scarce on its safety.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases (from inception through July 2018) to identify studies that reported on the use of LAMS in GBD. The outcomes measured were the pooled rates of all adverse events (AEs), pooled rates of early AEs and pooled rates of delayed AEs.

resultsA total of 8 studies (393 patients) were included. The pooled rate of all AEs was 12.7% (95% CI 8.4-18.7, I

conclusionWe report an overall AE rate of 13% with LAMS in EUS-GBD. Early AE risk appears to be 6.5% and delayed AE risk appears to be 8%. Our results are analyzed out of good-quality studies, with minimal to zero heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsgallbladder drainagelumen-apposing metal stentsself-expanding metal stents

Identifiers

PMID31115387
PMCPMC6714485
OpenAlexW2944243954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.