Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31115345›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2019

A Web-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention to Improve Social and Occupational Functioning in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (The SpringboarD Trial): Randomized Controlled Trial.

Janine Clarke, Samineh Sanatkar, Peter Andrew Baldwin, Susan Fletcher, Jane Gunn, Kay Wilhelm, Lesley Campbell, Nicholas Zwar, Mark Harris, Helen Lapsley and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Janine ClarkeBlack Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-5273
Samineh SanatkarSchool of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-163X
Peter Andrew Baldwin *Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3319-6252
Susan FletcherDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-8650
Jane GunnDepartment of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8836-7525
Kay WilhelmSchool of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8542-6478
Lesley CampbellDiabetes and Metabolism Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7775-0246
Nicholas ZwarSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6462-9121
Mark HarrisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0705-8913
Helen LapsleySchool of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3376-7131
Dusan Hadzi-PavlovicSchool of Psychiatry, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2059-3865
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-2065
Judy ProudfootBlack Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3872-9871
Black Dog Institute · AUUNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepressive symptoms are common in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Effective depression treatments exist; however, access to psychological support is characteristically low. Web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is accessible, nonstigmatizing, and may help address substantial personal and public health impact of comorbid T2DM and depression.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the Web-based CBT program, myCompass, for improving social and occupational functioning in adults with T2DM and mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms. myCompass is a fully automated, self-guided public health treatment program for common mental health problems. The impact of treatment on depressive symptoms, diabetes-related distress, anxiety symptoms, and self-care behavior was also examined.

methodsParticipants with T2DM and mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms (N=780) were recruited online via Google and Facebook advertisements targeting adults with T2DM and via community and general practice settings. Screening, consent, and self-report scales were all self-administered online. Participants were randomized using double-blind computerized block randomization to either myCompass (n=391) for 8 weeks plus a 4-week tailing-off period or an active placebo intervention (n=379). At baseline and postintervention (3 months), participants completed the Work and Social Adjustment Scale, the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item, Diabetes Distress Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 item, and items from the Self-Management Profile for Type 2 Diabetes.

resultsmyCompass users logged in an average of 6 times and completed an average of .29 modules. Healthy Lifestyles users logged in an average of 4 times and completed an average of 1.37 modules. At baseline, mean scores on several outcome measures, including the primary outcome of work and social functioning, were near to the normal range, despite an extensive recruitment process. Approximately 61.6% (473/780) of participants completed the postintervention assessment. Intention-to-treat analyses revealed improvement in functioning, depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and healthy eating over time in both groups. Except for blood glucose monitoring and medication adherence, there were no specific between-group effects. Follow-up analyses suggested the outcomes did not depend on age, morbidity, or treatment engagement.

conclusionsImprovement in social and occupational functioning and the secondary outcomes was generally no greater for myCompass users than for users of the control program at 3 months postintervention. These findings should be interpreted in light of near-normal mean baseline scores on several variables, the self-selected study sample, and sample attrition. Further attention to factors influencing uptake and engagement with mental health treatments by people with T2DM, and the impact of illness comorbidity on patient conceptualization and experience of mental health symptoms, is essential to reduce the burden of T2DM.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000931572; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368109&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/7850eg8pi).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedOccupational MedicineOutcome Assessment, Health CareSocial SkillsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomedepressioninternettype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31115345
PMCPMC6548532
OpenAlexW2905200549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.