ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019
Photoacoustic properties of anterior ocular tissues.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential of photoacoustic imaging for assessing tumor perfusion in intraocular tumors and high-resolution choroidal microvascular imaging: from technical advances to clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Niche preclinical and clinical applications of photoacoustic imaging with endogenous contrast.Photoacoustics · 2023Review
- Magnetic Nano-Platform Enhanced iPSC-Derived Trabecular Meshwork Delivery and Tracking Efficiency.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Multimodal Photoacoustic Imaging-Guided Regression of Corneal Neovascularization: A Non-Invasive and Safe Strategy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Article
- Development of a stem cell tracking platform for ophthalmic applications using ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging.Theranostics · 2019Article
- Improving Stem Cell Delivery to the Trabecular Meshwork Using Magnetic Nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical imaging techniques for the anterior segment of the eye provide excellent anatomical information, but molecular imaging techniques are lacking. Molecular photoacoustic imaging is one option to address this need, but implementation requires use of contrast agents to distinguish molecular targets from background photoacoustic signals. Contrast agents are typically selected based on a priori knowledge of photoacoustic properties of tissues. However, photoacoustic properties of anterior ocular tissues have not been studied yet. Herein, anterior segment anatomy and corresponding photoacoustic signals were analyzed in brown and blue porcine eyes ex vivo. Measured photoacoustic spectra were compared to known optical absorption spectra of endogenous chromophores. In general, experimentally measured photoacoustic spectra matched expectations based on absorption spectra of endogenous chromophores reported in the literature, and similar photoacoustic spectra were observed in blue and brown porcine eyes. However, unique light-tissue interactions at the iris modified photoacoustic signals from melanin. Finally, we demonstrated how the measured PA spectra established herein can be used for one application of molecular PA imaging, detecting photoacoustically labeled stem cells in the anterior segment for glaucoma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.