Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31114872›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

DaReUS-Loop: a web server to model multiple loops in homology models.

Yasaman Karami, Julien Rey, Guillaume Postic, Samuel Murail, Pierre Tufféry, Sjoerd J de Vries

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasaman KaramiSorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.
Julien ReySorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.
Guillaume PosticSorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.
Samuel MurailSorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.
Pierre TufférySorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.
Sjoerd J de VriesSorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loop regions in protein structures often have crucial roles, and they are much more variable in sequence and structure than other regions. In homology modeling, this leads to larger deviations from the homologous templates, and loop modeling of homology models remains an open problem. To address this issue, we have previously developed the DaReUS-Loop protocol, leading to significant improvement over existing methods. Here, a DaReUS-Loop web server is presented, providing an automated platform for modeling or remodeling loops in the context of homology models. This is the first web server accepting a protein with up to 20 loop regions, and modeling them all in parallel. It also provides a prediction confidence level that corresponds to the expected accuracy of the loops. DaReUS-Loop facilitates the analysis of the results through its interactive graphical interface and is freely available at http://bioserv.rpbs.univ-paris-diderot.fr/services/DaReUS-Loop/.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularSoftwareStructural Homology, ProteinInternet

Identifiers

PMID31114872
PMCPMC6602439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.