Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31114767›Full record

ArticleResearch and reports in urology2019

Self-management in women with stress incontinence: strategies, outcomes and integration into clinical care.

Sarah C Titman, Stephen C Radley, Thomas G Gray

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and reports in urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04352647 (Observational Study on the Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Federates Athletes in Castilla y León.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04352647 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Observational Study on the Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Federates Athletes in Castilla y León.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversidad Católica de ÁvilaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled63ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsfemale athletes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah C TitmanCommunity Continence Service, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Stephen C RadleyUrogynaecology Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Thomas G GrayUrogynaecology Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this review is to present and discuss up-to-date conservative treatment strategies for the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. This review aims to provide an overview of the importance of initial self-management strategies and conservative management options for women with SUI and how these treatments can be integrated into clinical practice. The various treatment modalities available including pelvic floor physiotherapy, biofeedback, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation devices, in addition to lifestyle changes which can significantly affect symptoms, are discussed. The relevance and importance of individual assessment and training programs is highlighted in addition to additional adjuncts available to facilitate rehabilitation and symptom improvement. Expected outcomes for women with mild to moderate SUI who participate in targeted individualized conservative management programs are generally good, with a high likelihood of substantial improvement in symptoms.

Indexed as

pelvic floor disordersphysical therapy modalitiesstressurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID31114767
PMCPMC6489641
OpenAlexW2937082291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.