Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31114711›Full record

ReviewFuture science OA2019

Probiotics: current landscape and future horizons.

Richard Lj Day, Ashton J Harper, Rachel M Woods, Owen G Davies, Liam M Heaney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future science OA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The role ofFood science and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. ProbResist: a database for drug-resistant probiotic bacteria.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Potential application of the probioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard Lj DayADM Protexin Ltd, Lopen Head, Somerset, TA13 5JH, UK.
Ashton J HarperADM Protexin Ltd, Lopen Head, Somerset, TA13 5JH, UK.
Rachel M WoodsSchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
Owen G DaviesSchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
Liam M HeaneySchool of Sport, Exercise & Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-0167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years there has been a rapid rise in interest for the application of probiotic supplements to act as mediators in health and disease. This appeal is predominantly due to ever-increasing evidence of the interaction of the microbiota and pathophysiological processes of disease within the human host. This narrative review considers the current landscape of the probiotic industry and its research, and discusses current pitfalls in the lack of translation from laboratory science to clinical application. Future considerations into how industry and academia must adapt probiotic research to maximize success are suggested, including more targeted application of probiotic strains dependent on individual capabilities as well as application of multiple advanced analytical technologies to further understand and accelerate microbiome science.

Indexed as

diseasehealthmetabolomicsmetagenomicsmetatranscriptomicsmicrobiomeprobioticsproteomics

Identifiers

PMID31114711
PMCPMC6511921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.