Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31114701›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2019

Risk of cardiovascular event and mortality in relation to refill and guideline adherence to lipid-lowering medications among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Sweden.

Sofia Axia Karlsson, Björn Eliasson, Stefan Franzén, Mervete Miftaraj, Ann-Marie Svensson, Karolina Andersson Sundell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Per-TreatmentKidney international reports · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sofia Axia KarlssonDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1896-9587
Björn EliassonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stefan FranzénNational Diabetes Register, Centre of Registers, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mervete MiftarajNational Diabetes Register, Centre of Registers, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ann-Marie SvenssonNational Diabetes Register, Centre of Registers, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karolina Andersson SundellDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in relation to adherence to lipid-lowering medications by healthcare centers and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Research design and methods: We included 121 914 patients (12% secondary prevention) with T2DM reported by 1363 healthcare centers. Patients initiated lipid-lowering medications between July 2006 and December 2012 and were followed from cessation of the first filled supply until multidose dispensed medications, migration, CV events, death or December 2016. The study period was divided into 4-month intervals through 2014, followed by annual intervals through 2016. Adherence measures were assessed for each interval. Patients' (refill) adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR). Healthcare centers' (guideline) adherence represented the prescription prevalence of lipid-lowering medications according to guidelines. The risk of CV events and mortality was analyzed for each interval using Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier. Results: Compared with high-adherent patients (MPR >80%), low-adherent primary prevention patients (MPR ≤80%) showed higher risk of all outcomes: 44%-51 % for CV events, doubled for all-cause mortality and 79%-90% for CV mortality. Corresponding risks for low-adherent secondary prevention patients were 17%-19% for CV events, 88%-97% for all-cause and 66%-79% for CV mortality. Primary prevention patients treated by low-adherent healthcare centers (guideline adherence <48%) had a higher risk of CV events and CV mortality. Otherwise, no difference in the risk of CV events or mortality was observed by guideline adherence level. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the importance of high refill adherence and thus the value of individualized care among patients with T2DM.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards Modelscardiovascular diseasecardiovascular disease preventioncardiovascular eventguideline adherencelipid-lowering medicationsrefill adherencetype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID31114701
PMCPMC6501851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.