Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31114611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

NormExpression: An R Package to Normalize Gene Expression Data Using Evaluated Methods.

Zhenfeng Wu, Weixiang Liu, Xiufeng Jin, Haishuo Ji, Hua Wang, Gustavo Glusman, Max Robinson, Lin Liu, Jishou Ruan, Shan Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative study on the molecular mechanisms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. The RNA mThe EMBO journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Temporal Expression Analysis to Unravel Gene Regulatory Dynamics by microRNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The RNA mNature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhenfeng WuSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Weixiang LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiufeng JinCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Haishuo JiCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hua WangCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Gustavo GlusmanInstitute for Systems Biology, Washington, DC, United States.
Max RobinsonInstitute for Systems Biology, Washington, DC, United States.
Lin LiuCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Jishou RuanSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Shan GaoCollege of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data normalization is a crucial step in the gene expression analysis as it ensures the validity of its downstream analyses. Although many metrics have been designed to evaluate the existing normalization methods, different metrics or different datasets by the same metric yield inconsistent results, particularly for the single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. The worst situations could be that one method evaluated as the best by one metric is evaluated as the poorest by another metric, or one method evaluated as the best using one dataset is evaluated as the poorest using another dataset. Here raises an open question: principles need to be established to guide the evaluation of normalization methods. In this study, we propose a principle that one normalization method evaluated as the best by one metric should also be evaluated as the best by another metric (the consistency of metrics) and one method evaluated as the best using scRNA-seq data should also be evaluated as the best using bulk RNA-seq data or microarray data (the consistency of datasets). Then, we designed a new metric named Area Under normalized CV threshold Curve (AUCVC) and applied it with another metric mSCC to evaluate 14 commonly used normalization methods using both scRNA-seq data and bulk RNA-seq data, satisfying the consistency of metrics and the consistency of datasets. Our findings paved the way to guide future studies in the normalization of gene expression data with its evaluation. The raw gene expression data, normalization methods, and evaluation metrics used in this study have been included in an R package named NormExpression. NormExpression provides a framework and a fast and simple way for researchers to select the best method for the normalization of their gene expression data based on the evaluation of different methods (particularly some data-driven methods or their own methods) in the principle of the consistency of metrics and the consistency of datasets.

Indexed as

evaluationgene expressionnormalizationR packagescRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID31114611
PMCPMC6503164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.