Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113985›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

The effect of 808 nm and 905 nm wavelength light on recovery after spinal cord injury.

Barbora Svobodova, Anna Kloudova, Jiri Ruzicka, Ludmila Kajtmanova, Leos Navratil, Radek Sedlacek, Tomas Suchy, Meena Jhanwar-Uniyal, Pavla Jendelova, Lucia Machova Urdzikova

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07467850 (Dual Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07467850 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Dual Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpaulding Rehabilitation HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled8ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmstsDCS+pDCS, Low-level laser therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbora SvobodovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5791-6349
Anna KloudovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri RuzickaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ludmila Kajtmanova3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Leos NavratilDepartment of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Radek SedlacekLaboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomas SuchyLaboratory of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Meena Jhanwar-UniyalNew York Medical College, New York, USA.
Pavla JendelovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. pavla.jendelova@iem.cas.cz.
Lucia Machova UrdzikovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. lucia.machova@iem.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-5837
Charles University · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine · CZNew York Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the effect of a Multiwave Locked System laser (with a simultaneous 808 nm continuous emission and 905 nm pulse emission) on the spinal cord after spinal cord injury (SCI) in rats. The functional recovery was measured by locomotor tests (BBB, Beam walking, MotoRater) and a sensitivity test (Plantar test). The locomotor tests showed a significant improvement of the locomotor functions of the rats after laser treatment from the first week following lesioning, compared to the controls. The laser treatment significantly diminished thermal hyperalgesia after SCI as measured by the Plantar test. The atrophy of the soleus muscle was reduced in the laser treated rats. The histopathological investigation showed a positive effect of the laser therapy on white and gray matter sparing. Our data suggests an upregulation of M2 macrophages in laser treated animals by the increasing number of double labeled CD68+/CD206+ cells in the cranial and central parts of the lesion, compared to the control animals. A shift in microglial/macrophage polarization was confirmed by gene expression analysis by significant mRNA downregulation of Cd86 (marker of inflammatory M1), and non-significant upregulation of Arg1 (marker of M2). These results demonstrated that the combination of 808 nm and 905 nm wavelength light is a promising non-invasive therapy for improving functional recovery and tissue sparing after SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticB7-2 AntigenCD68 MoleculeLectins, C-TypeLocomotionLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorRatsRats, WistarReceptors, Cell SurfaceSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticB7-2 AntigenCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeLectins, C-TypeMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID31113985
PMCPMC6529518
OpenAlexW2946791966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.