Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113486›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2019

Toward a comprehensive view of cancer immune responsiveness: a synopsis from the SITC workshop.

Davide Bedognetti, Michele Ceccarelli, Lorenzo Galluzzi, Rongze Lu, Karolina Palucka, Josue Samayoa, Stefani Spranger, Sarah Warren, Kwok-Kin Wong, Elad Ziv and 46 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Survival after cessation of immunotherapies in melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Advancing vaccine development againstFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Network medicinesJournal of translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

56 authors.

Davide BedognettiSidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Michele CeccarelliAbbVie, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Lorenzo GalluzziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Rongze LuAbbVie, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Karolina PaluckaThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Josue SamayoaAbbVie, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Stefani SprangerKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Cambridge, MT, USA.
Sarah WarrenNanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Kwok-Kin WongPerlmutter Cancer Center, New York Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Elad ZivUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Diego ChowellMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lisa M CoussensOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Daniel D De CarvalhoDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
David G DeNardoWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jérôme GalonINSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Sorbonne Université, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Descartes, Université Paris Diderot; Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, F-75006, Paris, France.
Howard L KaufmanMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA and Replimune, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA.
Tomas KirchhoffPerlmutter Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health New York, New York, NY, USA.
Michael T LotzeUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jason J LukeUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andy J MinnAbramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Katerina PolitiYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Leonard D ShultzThe Jackson Laboratory Cancer Center, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Richard SimonR. Simon Consulting, Potomac, MD, USA.
Vésteinn ThórssonInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joanne B WeidhaasUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Maria Libera AsciertoMedImmune, Gaithersberg, MD, USA.
Paolo Antonio AsciertoIstituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS Fondazione 'G. Pascale', Naples, Italy.
James M BarnesAbbVie, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Valentin BarsanStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Praveen K BommareddyRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Adrian BotKite, a Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Sarah E ChurchNanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Gennaro CilibertoIRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
Andrea De MariaUniversità degli Studi di Genova and Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Dobrin DraganovCalidi Biotherapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA.
Winson S HoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Heather M McGeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Anne MonetteLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joseph F MurphyCaprion Biosciences Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Paola NisticòIRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.
Wungki ParkMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Maulik PatelAbbVie, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Michael QuigleyBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Laszlo RadvanyiOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Harry RaftopoulosBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ, USA.
Nils-Petter RudqvistDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra SnyderMerck & Co., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Randy F SweisUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sara ValpioneCRUK Manchester Institute and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Roberta ZappasodiLudwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lisa H ButterfieldParker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mary L DisisUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bernard A FoxEarle A. Chiles Research Institute, Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
Alessandra CesanoNanoString Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Francesco M MarincolaRefuge Biotechnologies Inc., 1505 Adams Drive, Suite D, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. franco.marincola@refugebiotech.com.
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Cancer Immune Responsiveness Task Force and Working Groups

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Washington University SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA196510 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAWKINS, WILLIAM G · 2016 to 2020
$10.9M
The Impact of Macrophage Origin on the Pathogenesis and Treatment Resistance of Pancreatic CancerR01CA177670 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENARDO, DAVID G · 2014 to 2023
$3.3M
Exploiting Integrin Signaling to Overcome Resistance to ImmunotherapyR01CA244938 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENARDO, DAVID G, GUPTA, VINEET · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Germ-line miRNA binding site variants as biomarkers of toxicity and response to checkpoint inhibitionR01CA238998 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WEIDHAAS, JOANNE B · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
COMBINED TUMOR AND STROMAL TARGETING TO IMPROVE PANCREATIC CANCER RESPONSE TO IMMUNOTHERAPYR01CA203890 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENARDO, DAVID G · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Elucidating immunotherapy resistance mechanisms in non-T cell-inflamed bladder cancerK08CA234392 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SWEIS, RANDY F. · 2018 to 2021
$851k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234392NCI NIH HHS L30 CA199313NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196510NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177670NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203890NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238998NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor immunology has changed the landscape of cancer treatment. Yet, not all patients benefit as cancer immune responsiveness (CIR) remains a limitation in a considerable proportion of cases. The multifactorial determinants of CIR include the genetic makeup of the patient, the genomic instability central to cancer development, the evolutionary emergence of cancer phenotypes under the influence of immune editing, and external modifiers such as demographics, environment, treatment potency, co-morbidities and cancer-independent alterations including immune homeostasis and polymorphisms in the major and minor histocompatibility molecules, cytokines, and chemokines. Based on the premise that cancer is fundamentally a disorder of the genes arising within a cell biologic process, whose deviations from normality determine the rules of engagement with the host's response, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a task force of experts from various disciplines including, immunology, oncology, biophysics, structural biology, molecular and cellular biology, genetics, and bioinformatics to address the complexity of CIR from a holistic view. The task force was launched by a workshop held in San Francisco on May 14-15, 2018 aimed at two preeminent goals: 1) to identify the fundamental questions related to CIR and 2) to create an interactive community of experts that could guide scientific and research priorities by forming a logical progression supported by multiple perspectives to uncover mechanisms of CIR. This workshop was a first step toward a second meeting where the focus would be to address the actionability of some of the questions identified by working groups. In this event, five working groups aimed at defining a path to test hypotheses according to their relevance to human cancer and identifying experimental models closest to human biology, which include: 1) Germline-Genetic, 2) Somatic-Genetic and 3) Genomic-Transcriptional contributions to CIR, 4) Determinant(s) of Immunogenic Cell Death that modulate CIR, and 5) Experimental Models that best represent CIR and its conversion to an immune responsive state. This manuscript summarizes the contributions from each group and should be considered as a first milestone in the path toward a more contemporary understanding of CIR. We appreciate that this effort is far from comprehensive and that other relevant aspects related to CIR such as the microbiome, the individual's recombined T cell and B cell receptors, and the metabolic status of cancer and immune cells were not fully included. These and other important factors will be included in future activities of the taskforce. The taskforce will focus on prioritization and specific actionable approach to answer the identified questions and implementing the collaborations in the follow-up workshop, which will be held in Houston on September 4-5, 2019.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAdvisory CommitteesAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCongresses as TopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsSocieties, MedicalTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerCancer immune phenotypeCancer immune responsiveness (CIR)Germline molecular alterationsImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)Immune oncology (IO)Immunogenic cell death (ICD)ImmunotherapySomatic molecular alterationsTumor microenvironment (TME)Tumor mutational burden (TMB)

Identifiers

PMID31113486
PMCPMC6529999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.