Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113480›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Using Facebook to reduce smoking among Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: a participatory grounded action study.

Marita Hefler, Vicki Kerrigan, Becky Freeman, Gordon Robert Boot, David P Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
31.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marita HeflerTobacco Control Research Program, Wellbeing & Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia. marita.hefler@menzies.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1709-1098
Vicki KerriganTobacco Control Research Program, Wellbeing & Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.
Becky FreemanPrevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Gordon Robert BootMiwatj Health Aboriginal Corporation, PO Box 519, Nhulunbuy, NT, 0881, Australia.
David P ThomasTobacco Control Research Program, Wellbeing & Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research · AUMaari Ma Health · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia 1098308National Heart Foundation of Australia 101938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence for the effectiveness of social media to promote healthy behaviour among Indigenous Australians, including to reduce smoking. Social media has significant potential to stimulate interpersonal influence to quit, however an important knowledge gap is how and what content people choose to share with friends and family. This paper explores the decision making processes of community members for sharing tobacco control content with family and friends on Facebook.

methodsCommunity researchers were paid to choose and share at least one tobacco control post per week for a period of 6 months on their personal Facebook page. They documented reasons for their choices, which were coded and analysed to determine features of messages most likely to be shared, and salient considerations in the decision-making process.

resultsPosts which are child-focused, feature Indigenous content, and are perceived as practical, relevant and credible, with a direct and unambiguous message, were most likely to be shared. Posts which included disgusting imagery about health impacts, were focused on the environment, or were ambiguous or sarcastic were less likely to be shared. Decisions were also based on whether content was perceived to contain new information, to be helpful for their friends, and to be consistent with the participant's online identity, as well as the perceived sensitivity of content. The potential impact on expensive mobile data for videos was also a factor.

conclusionsWhen designing tobacco control messages to be shared on social media, health promoters should take into account how information will align with positive self-image and can contribute to social capital among the intended audience, and generate interpersonal engagement. Content should complement, rather than attempt to replicate, some message features that are effective on traditional broadcast media. This study shows the potential for health services to incorporate a strategy of using paid local social media 'champions' or 'ambassadors' to disseminate tobacco control messages on Facebook through community networks.

Indexed as

Social MediaAdultAustraliaCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking PreventionYoung AdultHealth communicationIndigenous healthQualitative researchSmokingSocial media

Identifiers

PMID31113480
PMCPMC6528248
OpenAlexW2946344448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.