Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113445›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Spatiotemporal analysis and environmental risk factors of visceral leishmaniasis in an urban setting in São Paulo State, Brazil.

Luiz E Prestes-Carneiro, Loris A F Daniel, Lívia C Almeida, Lourdes Zampieri D'Andrea, André G Vieira, Ivete R Anjolete, Lenira André, Edilson F Flores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Temporal and spatial analysis of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil, by age group and sex: an ecological study, 2013-2022.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luiz E Prestes-CarneiroInfectious Diseases and Immunology Department, Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil. luiz@unoeste.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-1525
Loris A F DanielInfectious Diseases and Immunology Department, Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lívia C AlmeidaInfectious Diseases and Immunology Department, Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lourdes Zampieri D'AndreaCenter for Biomedical Sciences and Regional Laboratory, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
André G VieiraMunicipal Secretariat of Environment, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ivete R AnjoleteSupervision in Control of Endemics, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lenira AndréStatistics Department, School of Sciences and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente Campus, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edilson F FloresStatistics Department, School of Sciences and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente Campus, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Universidade do Oeste Paulista 2251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Latin America, Brazil harbors the most cases of human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL). Since the early 1980s, the disease has spread to the urban centers of the north, and now the south and west of Brazil; it reached São Paulo state in the southeast in 1996, and Presidente Prudente in the western region in 2010. Our aim was to describe the spatiotemporal analysis and environmental risk factors associated with the dispersion of VL in Presidente Prudente, an urban setting with recent transmission.

methodsAn entomological survey was carried out from 2009 to 2015. A canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) serosurvey was performed from 2010 to 2015 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), a dual-path platform CVL rapid test, and indirect fluorescent antibodies (IFAT). Data from HVL cases were obtained from the Municipal Surveillance Epidemiology Center from 2013 to 2017. Data on water drainage and forest fragments were obtained from public platforms and irregular solid-waste deposits were determined by monthly inspections of the urban area. Kernel density maps of the distribution of CVL were constructed.

resultsFrom 2009 to 2015, Lutzomyia longipalpis sand flies were found in all seven areas of Presidente Prudente. From 2010 to 2015, 40,309 dogs were serologically screened and 638 showed positive results, i.e. a prevalence rate of 1.6%. From 2013 to 2017, six human cases were diagnosed with a mortality rate of 33.3%. In 2015, 56 points of irregular solid-waste deposits were identified, predominantly in the neighborhoods. Three different hotspots of CVL showed an increased distribution of vectors, seropositive dogs, irregular solid-waste deposits, forest fragments and water drainage.

conclusionsThe use of tools that analyze the spatial distribution of vectors, canine and human VL as environmental risk factors were essential to identifying the areas most vulnerable to the spread or maintenance of VL. The results may help public health authorities in planning prevention and control measures to avoid expansion and future outbreaks.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSpatio-Temporal AnalysisAnimalsBrazilDog DiseasesDogsEntomologyEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHumansInsect VectorsLeishmaniasis, VisceralMalePsychodidaeRisk FactorsUrban PopulationCanine visceral leishmaniasisEntomological surveyHuman visceral leishmaniasisLutzomyia longipalpis

Identifiers

PMID31113445
PMCPMC6528369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.