ReviewBMC complementary and alternative medicine2019
Avoiding pitfalls in determining antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and publishing the results.
Review in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Antibacterial Properties of Acmella Species: A Systematic Literature Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Appraising the therapeutical potentials ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review of antibacterial activity of polyphenolic extract from date palm (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Thai Stingless Bee Propolis Extracts.Biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Phytochemicals from Fagonia glutinosa with anti-hemorrhoid, antipyretic, antiarthritic, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Antimicrobial, Cyto-Genotoxic, and Antigenotoxic Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Secondary Metabolite Profiling, In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity Evaluation, and In Vivo Acute Toxicity Assessment ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2026Article
- In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities and phytochemical screening of 80% methanol extract from Ehretia cymosa leaves.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Unveiling the Therapeutic Spectrum of Annona reticulata Linn.: Antibacterial, Insecticidal, and Antidiarrheal Insights.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
- Ethnoveterinary Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of African herbal preparations against multidrug-resistantScientific African · 2025Article
- Rational search for natural antimicrobial compounds: relevance of sesquiterpene lactones.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2025Article
- Antibacterial Activity of Traditional Medicinal Plants: Combating Antibiotics Resistance in Animal Wound Infections.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Integrated evaluation of antifungal activity of pomegranate peel polyphenols against a diverse range of postharvest fruit pathogens.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2025Article
- Article
- Algae and Cyanobacteria Fatty Acids and Bioactive Metabolites: Natural Antifungal Alternative AgainstMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Antibacterial activity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is an urgent need to discover new antimicrobial compounds or extracts to address the crucial problem of increasing microbial resistance against current antibiotics. Plant chemical biodiversity is a valuable potential resource. Although compounds from plants are used as basis for several human drugs, no commercially successful antibiotic has yet been discovered from plants, despite more than a thousand publications in this field per year. This may be due to wrong methods that have been used or wrong plants that were investigated. A lot of energy is wasted by using techniques such as agar diffusion that do not work well with plant extracts. Many manuscripts are rejected before sending to reviewers because wrong methods are used. Antimicrobial activity of plant extracts based on agar diffusion studies have limited value.
methodsResults obtained from several hundred of our publications in this area as researcher and experience as editor was used to identify difficulties in generating reproducible data. Other publications were also consulted and procedures used were evaluated.
resultsBecause many of the antimicrobial compounds in plant extracts are relatively non-polar, these compounds do not diffuse well in the aqueous agar matrix used in agar diffusion studies. So many other factors also influence the zone of inhibition, that results between different laboratories are not comparable. The different methods used to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in serial dilution studies have been discussed. Using p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet to indicate growth provided the best results. Factors such as inoculum size, solvent, selection of positive controls and selection of plants to investigate also play a role. A method developed to determine antibacterial and antifungal activity of plant extracts work very well and is widely used based on > 1830 citations.
conclusionsBy using proposed methods manuscripts will provide reproducible information that may be published in good journals. The publications could contribute to a rational basis for finding compounds or extracts from plants that may address the problem of antimicrobial resistance. Random screening of a large number of plant species using this technique have already led to some commercial applications and identification of a potentially new antifungal framework compound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.