Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113406›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?

Charlotte A van der Velden, M C van der Steen, Jens Leenders, Florens Q M P van Douveren, Rob P A Janssen, Max Reijman

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transcultural adaptation and validation of a Korea version of Pedi-IKDC questionnaire.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte A van der VeldenOrthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600, PD, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. charlottevandervelden@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4940-1951
M C van der SteenOrthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600, PD, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. marieke.vander.steen@mmc.nl.
Jens LeendersOrthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600, PD, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Florens Q M P van DouverenOrthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600, PD, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Rob P A JanssenOrthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600, PD, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Max ReijmanOrthopaedic Center Máxima, Máxima Medical Center, Postbus 90052, 5600, PD, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice.

methodsThe English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.

resultsThe Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses).

conclusionsThe Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

Indexed as

Injury Severity ScoreSurveys and QuestionnairesActivities of Daily LivingAdolescentArthralgiaChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleNetherlandsPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsPsychometricsAdolescentsPatient reported outcome measuresTranslationValidation

Identifiers

PMID31113406
PMCPMC6530098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.