Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113329›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Genomes reveal drastic and recurrent phenotypic divergence in firetip skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae: Pyrrhopyginae).

Jing Zhang, Qian Cong, Jinhui Shen, Ernst Brockmann, Nick V Grishin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A taxonomic overview of theThe taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026
    Article
  2. Three butterfly genera across the Central Texas Suture Zone.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026
    Article
  3. Butterfly taxa discovery via genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026
    Article
  4. Genomic analysis reveals new subspecies ofThe taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Notable Hesperiidae collected by Kilian Roever in Arizona, USA.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  8. Advancing butterfly systematics through genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  9. New butterfly taxa and findings from genomic analyses.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What one genus of showy moths can say about migration, adaptation, and wing pattern.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. New taxa of butterflies supported by genomic analysis.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2024
    Article
  14. Taxonomic advances driven by the genomic analysis of butterflies.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic analysis reveals new species and subspecies of butterflies.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2023
    Article
  19. Butterfly classification and species discovery using genomics.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jing Zhang2 Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9050 , USA.
Qian Cong2 Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9050 , USA.
Jinhui Shen2 Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9050 , USA.
Ernst Brockmann3 Laubacher Str. 4 , 35423 Lich, Hessen , Germany.
Nick V Grishin1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9050 , USA.

Funding

Computational methods for structural-functional studies of proteinsR01GM094575 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRISHIN, NICK V. · 2010 to 2017
$2.4M
Computational analysis of proteinsR35GM127390 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRISHIN, NICK V. · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094575NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologists marvel at the powers of adaptive convergence, when distantly related animals look alike. While mimetic wing patterns of butterflies have fooled predators for millennia, entomologists inferred that mimics were distant relatives despite similar appearance. However, the obverse question has not been frequently asked. Who are the close relatives of mimetic butterflies and what are their features? As opposed to close convergence, divergence from a non-mimetic relative would also be extreme. When closely related animals look unalike, it is challenging to pair them. Genomic analysis promises to elucidate evolutionary relationships and shed light on molecular mechanisms of divergence. We chose the firetip skipper butterfly as a model due to its phenotypic diversity and abundance of mimicry. We sequenced and analysed whole genomes of nearly 120 representative species. Genomes partitioned this subfamily Pyrrhopyginae into five tribes (1 new), 23 genera and, additionally, 22 subgenera (10 new). The largest tribe Pyrrhopygini is divided into four subtribes (three new). Surprisingly, we found five cases where a uniquely patterned butterfly was formerly placed in a genus of its own and separately from its close relatives. In several cases, extreme and rapid phenotypic divergence involved not only wing patterns but also the structure of the male genitalia. The visually striking wing pattern difference between close relatives frequently involves disappearance or suffusion of spots and colour exchange between orange and blue. These differences (in particular, a transition between unspotted black and striped wings) happen recurrently on a short evolutionary time scale, and are therefore probably achieved by a small number of mutations.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeAnimalsBiological MimicryButterfliesColorFemaleMalebiodiversityhigher classificationmimicry ringsmuseomicssinimustvalge patternskipper butterflies

Identifiers

PMID31113329
PMCPMC6545083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.