Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113327›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Combined effects of mutualistic rhizobacteria counteract virus-induced suppression of indirect plant defences in soya bean.

Hannier Pulido, Kerry E Mauck, Consuelo M De Moraes, Mark C Mescher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The plant growth-promoting rhizobacteriumProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effects of Root-Colonizing Fluorescent Pseudomonas Strains onApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannier Pulido1 Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich) , 8092 Zürich , Switzerland.
Kerry E Mauck2 Department of Entomology, University of California , Riverside, CA , USA.
Consuelo M De Moraes1 Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich) , 8092 Zürich , Switzerland.
Mark C Mescher1 Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zürich) , 8092 Zürich , Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is increasingly clear that microbial plant symbionts can influence interactions between their plant hosts and other organisms. However, such effects remain poorly understood, particularly under ecologically realistic conditions where plants simultaneously interact with diverse mutualists and antagonists. Here, we examine how the effects of a plant virus on indirect plant defences against its insect vector are influenced by co-occurrence of other microbial plant symbionts. Using a multi-factorial design, we manipulated colonization of soya bean using three different microbes: a pathogenic plant virus (bean pod mottle virus (BPMV)), a nodule-forming beneficial rhizobacterium ( Bradyrhizobium japonicum) and a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium ( Delftia acidovorans). We then assessed recruitment of parasitoids ( Pediobious foveolatus (Eulophidae)) and parasitism rates following feeding by the BPMV vector Epilachna varivestis (Coccinellidae). BPMV infection suppressed parasitoid recruitment, prolonged parasitoid foraging time and reduced parasitism rates in semi-natural foraging assays. However, simultaneous colonization of BPMV-infected hosts by both rhizobacteria restored parasitoid recruitment and rates of parasitism to levels similar to uninfected controls. Co-colonization by the two rhizobacteria also enhanced parasitoid recruitment in the absence of BPMV infection. These results illustrate the potential of plant-associated microbes to influence indirect plant defences, with implications for disease transmission and herbivory, but also highlight the potential complexity of such interactions.

Indexed as

Plant ImmunitySymbiosisBradyrhizobiumComovirusDelftia acidovoransGlycine maxbean pod mottle virusbeneficial rhizobacteriaEpilachna varivestispathogenPediobious foveolatusplant volatiles

Identifiers

PMID31113327
PMCPMC6545077
OpenAlexW2945861903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.