Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31113250›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2020

User Satisfaction and Insulin Pump Handling With a Prefilled Insulin Cartridge in Adults and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.

Jitendra Gupta, Gitte Schøning Fuchs, Michael Jenkins, Brenda van Geel, Morten Lind Jensen, Thomas Sparre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jitendra GuptaNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9375-5781
Gitte Schøning FuchsNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Michael JenkinsUL LLC, Concord, MA, USA.
Brenda van GeelUL International (Netherlands) BV, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Morten Lind JensenNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Thomas SparreNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis comparative handling study investigated user satisfaction and insulin pump handling with a prefilled insulin cartridge versus a self-filled insulin reservoir in insulin pump users with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

methodsAdult (n = 105) and adolescent (n = 25) participants performed insulin pump preparations using a prefilled insulin cartridge and self-filled insulin reservoir. User satisfaction, insulin pump preparation time, and residual air in infusion set tubing were assessed for each insulin filling method. Post hoc analysis evaluated training time.

resultsUser satisfaction scores were statistically significantly different in favor of the prefilled insulin cartridge versus the self-filled insulin reservoir (mean [SD]: overall, 4.0 [0.5] vs 3.3 [0.9]; burden on the user, 1.8 [0.6] vs 2.9 [1.0]; user inconvenience, 2.0 [0.7] vs 2.8 [1.1]; device effectiveness, 3.9 [0.7] vs 3.6 [0.9]; all

conclusionsAdult and adolescent insulin pump users were more satisfied with the prefilled insulin cartridge versus the self-filled insulin reservoir when preparing an insulin pump. The prefilled insulin cartridge was associated with reduced insulin pump preparation time and reduced training time versus the self-filled insulin reservoir.

Indexed as

Insulin Infusion SystemsPatient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAgedChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHypoglycemic AgentsInsulininsulin pumppreparation timetraining timetype 1 diabetesuser satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31113250
PMCPMC7189155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.