Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112786›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Group-level cortical and muscular connectivity during perturbations to walking and standing balance.

Steven M Peterson, Daniel P Ferris

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05818410 (Human-Prosthetic Interaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05818410 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Human-Prosthetic Interaction: Brain & Technology After Lower-Limb Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorVrije Universiteit BrusselRan2024 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)ArmsProsthetic device (Lunaris), No prosthetic device, Prosthetic device (Sach foot)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven M PetersonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: stepeter@uw.edu.
Daniel P FerrisJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Supraspinal Control of Human Locomotor AdaptationR01NS104772 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Daniel P Ferris · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining balance is a complex process requiring multisensory processing and coordinated muscle activation. Previous studies have indicated that the cortex is directly involved in balance control, but less information is known about cortical flow of signals for balance. We studied source-localized electrocortical effective connectivity dynamics of healthy young subjects (29 subjects: 14 male and 15 female) walking and standing with both visual and physical perturbations to their balance. The goal of this study was to quantify differences in group-level corticomuscular connectivity responses to sensorimotor perturbations during walking and standing. We hypothesized that perturbed visual input during balance would transiently decrease connectivity between occipital and parietal areas due to disruptive visual input during sensory processing. We also hypothesized that physical pull perturbations would increase cortical connections to central sensorimotor areas because of higher sensorimotor integration demands. Our findings show decreased occipito-parietal connectivity during visual rotations and widespread increases in connectivity during pull perturbations focused on central areas, as expected. We also found evidence for communication from cortex to muscles during perturbed balance. These results show that sensorimotor perturbations to balance alter cortical networks and can be quantified using effective connectivity estimation.

Indexed as

Touch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultBrainElectroencephalographyElectromyographyFemaleHumansLegMaleMuscle, SkeletalNeural PathwaysPhysical StimulationPostural BalanceWalkingYoung AdultBalance perturbationEffective connectivityElectroencephalographyIndependent component analysisVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID31112786
PMCPMC6592721
OpenAlexW2945987807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.