Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112615›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2020

Social Relationships and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Postmenopausal Women.

Michael Hendryx, Wanda Nicholson, JoAnn E Manson, Candyce H Kroenke, Jennifer Lee, Julie C Weitlauf, Lorena Garcia, Junmei M Jonasson, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Juhua Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Understanding barriers and facilitators of adherence to lifestyle changes in prediabetes: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael HendryxDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington.
Wanda NicholsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diabetes and Obesity Core, Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina, Durham.
JoAnn E MansonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Candyce H KroenkeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California.
Jennifer LeeDivision of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Julie C WeitlaufPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Lorena GarciaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine University of California-Davis.
Junmei M JonassonDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine at Institute of Medicine Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Jean Wactawski-WendeDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, Buffalo, New York.
Juhua LuoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University Bloomington.

Funding

Social networks, breast cancer treatment, and survivalK07CA187403 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KROENKE, CANDYCE H · 2015 to 2019
$914k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA187403NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined whether social relationship variables (social support, social strain, social network size, and stressful life events) were associated with risk of developing type 2 diabetes among postmenopausal women.

method139,924 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years without prevalent diabetes at baseline were followed for a mean of 14 years. 19,240 women developed diabetes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models tested associations between social relationship variables and diabetes incidence after consideration of demographics, depressive symptoms, and lifestyle behaviors. We also examined moderating effects of obesity and race/ethnicity, and we tested whether social variable associations were mediated by lifestyle or depressive symptoms.

resultsCompared with the lowest quartile, women in the highest social support quartile had lower risk of diabetes after adjusting for demographic factors, health behaviors, and depressive symptoms (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-0.97). Social strain (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04-1.13) and stressful life events (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05-1.15) were associated with higher diabetes risks. The association between diabetes and social strain was stronger among African American women. Social relationship variables had direct relationships to diabetes, as well as indirect effects partially mediated by lifestyle and depressive symptoms. DISCUSSION: Social support, social strain, and stressful life events were associated with diabetes risk among postmenopausal women independently of demographic factors and health behaviors. In addition to healthy behaviors such as diet and physical activity, healthy social relationships among older women may be important in the prevention of diabetes.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSocial NetworkingSocial SupportStress, PsychologicalDiabetesSocial relationshipsWomen

Identifiers

PMID31112615
PMCPMC7530489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.