Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112475›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Positron Emission Tomography Score Has Greater Prognostic Significance Than Pretreatment Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma in the UK RAPID Study.

Sally F Barrington, Elizabeth H Phillips, Nicholas Counsell, Barry Hancock, Ruth Pettengell, Peter Johnson, William Townsend, Dominic Culligan, Bilyana Popova, Laura Clifton-Hadley and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of Early-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Multi-Institutional Data From South India.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. FocalThoracic cancer · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Controversies in the management of early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Sally F Barrington1 King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, Kings College London, King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth H Phillips2 Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas Counsell2 Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Barry Hancock3 University of Sheffield and Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ruth Pettengell4 St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter Johnson5 Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
William Townsend6 University College Hospital London, London, United Kingdom.
Dominic Culligan7 Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Bilyana Popova2 Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura Clifton-Hadley2 Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew McMillan8 Nottingham City Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Peter Hoskin9 Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Michael J O'Doherty1 King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, Kings College London, King's Health Partners, London, United Kingdom.
Tim Illidge10 Institute of Cancer Sciences and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
John Radford10 Institute of Cancer Sciences and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Cancer Research UK · GBKings Health Partners · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2016-07-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate stratification of patients is an important goal in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but the role of pretreatment clinical risk stratification in the context of positron emission tomography (PET) -adapted treatment is unclear. We performed a subsidiary analysis of the RAPID trial to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment risk factors and PET score in determining outcomes. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with stage IA to IIA HL and no mediastinal bulk underwent PET assessment after three cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; 143 PET-positive patients (PET score, 3 to 5) received a fourth doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine cycle and involved-field radiotherapy, and 419 patients in complete metabolic remission were randomly assigned to receive involved-field radiotherapy (n = 208) or no additional treatment (n = 211). Cox regression was used to investigate the association between PET score and pretreatment risk factors with HL-specific event-free survival (EFS).

resultsHigh PET score was associated with inferior EFS, before (

conclusionIn RAPID, a positive PET scan did not carry uniform prognostic weight; only a PET score of 5 was associated with inferior outcomes. This suggests that in future trials involving patients without B symptoms or mediastinal bulk, a score of 5 rather than a positive PET result should be used to guide treatment escalation in early-stage HL.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBleomycinCombined Modality TherapyDacarbazineDoxorubicinFemaleHodgkin DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBleomycinDacarbazineDoxorubicinVinblastine

Identifiers

PMID31112475
PMCPMC6638600
OpenAlexW2946457100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.