Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31112413›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019

Establishing how patient size and degree of miscentring affect CTDI

Sean Cournane, Eimear Brunell, Michael Rowan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sean Cournane1 Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, St James's hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Eimear Brunell2 Department Medical Physics and Clinical engineering, Tallaght University Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Michael Rowan3 Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital · IESt. James's Hospital · IETallaght University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe work aimed to investigate and model the relationship between CT dose index (CTDI

methodsCT scan parameters, patient dose metrics, patient positioning information and patient and water equivalent diameter information was extracted from abdomen, thorax-abdomen-pelvis and thorax imaging exams acquired on a 128-slice Siemens Somatom Definition AS + CT system using dose tracking software over a 1 year period. A miscentring factor, accounting for the magnification of the patient due to miscentring was derived. Significant predictors (

resultsThe model was capable of describing the CTDI

conclusionsWe demonstrate the use of clinical data, extracted from dose tracking software, to investigate and monitor AEC behaviour and CT output. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The presented model allows for the remote investigation of AEC behaviour using patient data.

Indexed as

Body SizeRadiation DosageHumansMonte Carlo MethodPatient PositioningPhantoms, ImagingRadiometryReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID31112413
PMCPMC6636259
OpenAlexW2946395205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.