ArticleNMR in biomedicine2019
Detection of lung transplant rejection in a rat model using hyperpolarized [1-
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian Control of Pulmonary Endothelial Signaling Occurs via the NADPH Oxidase 2-NLRP3 Pathway.Journal of biological rhythms · 2025Article
- Pulmonary vascular inflammation with fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): possible role for the NLRP3 inflammasome.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- Inhibition of Peroxiredoxin 6 PLA2 Activity Decreases Oxidative Stress and the Severity of Acute Lung Injury in the Mouse Cecal Ligation and Puncture Model.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Surveillance for acute cellular rejection after lung transplantation.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- IL-27Rα: A Novel Molecular Imaging Marker for Allograft Rejection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Metabolic Imaging and Biological Assessment: Platforms to Evaluate Acute Lung Injury and Inflammation.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current standard for noninvasive imaging of acute rejection consists of X-ray/CT, which derive their contrast from changes in ventilation, inflammation and edema, as well as remodeling during rejection. We propose the use of hyperpolarized [1-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.